» Articles » PMID: 36938345

Physician Review Websites: Understanding Patient Satisfaction with Ophthalmologists Using Natural Language Processing

Overview
Journal J Ophthalmol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2023 Mar 20
PMID 36938345
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The presence and influence of physician review websites (PRW) have increased significantly in the field of medicine. This study aims to better understand determinants of patient satisfaction and the sentiment of ophthalmologists using natural language processing of Healthgrades reviews.

Methods: Healthgrades is a PRW where patients submit verified reviews, containing a star rating and a narrative review, of US-based ophthalmologists. This was a quantitative observational study conducted on May 23, 2022. We identified associations between physician demographics and both the sentiment analysis scores of narrative reviews and star ratings using the Student's -tests and one-way ANOVA tests. After natural language processing the reviews, a logistic regression explored the impacts of the most frequent words on the positivity of a given review.

Results: This study examined a total of 16700 reviews of 1125 ophthalmologists. Ophthalmologists of younger age and male gender received statistically significantly higher star ratings and sentiment analysis scores; analysis of location of practice did not affect scores. Textual analysis revealed that words describing the physician's personality, such as "friendly" and "caring," increased the likelihood of reviews being positive more than descriptors of the visit's effectiveness, such as "results" and "efficient."

Conclusion: Younger and male ophthalmologists received higher star ratings and sentiment analysis scores. Additionally, results indicated that words describing the ophthalmologist's pleasant personality and the visit's effectiveness most positively impacted a review, whereas descriptors of a wait or an unpleasant personality most negatively impacted a review.

Citing Articles

Sex, Age, and Patient Experience in Cardiologist Reviews: A Large-Scale Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis.

Yang A, Rodriguez F, Woo J JACC Adv. 2024; 3(7):101046.

PMID: 39129993 PMC: 11312787. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101046.


Application of sentiment and word frequency analysis of physician review sites to evaluate refractive surgery care.

Vought V, Vought R, Lee A, Zhou I, Garneni M, Greenstein S Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2024; 4(2):78-83.

PMID: 38590556 PMC: 10999482. DOI: 10.1016/j.aopr.2024.03.002.

References
1.
De R, Pandey N, Pal A . Impact of digital surge during Covid-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice. Int J Inf Manage. 2020; 55:102171. PMC: 7280123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102171. View

2.
Segal J . The role of the Internet in doctor performance rating. Pain Physician. 2009; 12(3):659-64. View

3.
Vu A, Espinoza G, Perry J, Chundury R . Online Ratings of ASOPRS Surgeons: What Do Your Patients Really Think of You?. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 33(6):466-470. DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000829. View

4.
Schulz P, Rothenfluh F . Influence of Health Literacy on Effects of Patient Rating Websites: Survey Study Using a Hypothetical Situation and Fictitious Doctors. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(4):e14134. PMC: 7171560. DOI: 10.2196/14134. View

5.
Gao G, McCullough J, Agarwal R, Jha A . A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(1):e38. PMC: 3374528. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2003. View