» Articles » PMID: 36937926

Modelling Blood Flow in Patients with Heart Valve Disease Using Deep Learning: A Computationally Efficient Method to Expand Diagnostic Capabilities in Clinical Routine

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The computational modelling of blood flow is known to provide vital hemodynamic parameters for diagnosis and treatment-support for patients with valvular heart disease. However, most diagnosis/treatment-support solutions based on flow modelling proposed utilize time- and resource-intensive computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and are therefore difficult to implement into clinical practice. In contrast, deep learning (DL) algorithms provide results quickly with little need for computational power. Thus, modelling blood flow with DL instead of CFD may substantially enhances the usability of flow modelling-based diagnosis/treatment support in clinical routine. In this study, we propose a DL-based approach to compute pressure and wall-shear-stress (WSS) in the aorta and aortic valve of patients with aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods: A total of 103 individual surface models of the aorta and aortic valve were constructed from computed tomography data of AS patients. Based on these surface models, a total of 267 patient-specific, steady-state CFD simulations of aortic flow under various flow rates were performed. Using this simulation data, an artificial neural network (ANN) was trained to compute spatially resolved pressure and WSS using a centerline-based representation. An unseen test subset of 23 cases was used to compare both methods.

Results: ANN and CFD-based computations agreed well with a median relative difference between both methods of 6.0% for pressure and 4.9% for wall-shear-stress. Demonstrating the ability of DL to compute clinically relevant hemodynamic parameters for AS patients, this work presents a possible solution to facilitate the introduction of modelling-based treatment support into clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Generation of a virtual cohort of TAVI patients for in silico trials: a statistical shape and machine learning analysis.

Scuoppo R, Castelbuono S, Cannata S, Gentile G, Agnese V, Bellavia D Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; 63(2):467-482.

PMID: 39388030 PMC: 11750893. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03215-8.


Deep learning based assessment of hemodynamics in the coarctation of the aorta: comparison of bidirectional recurrent and convolutional neural networks.

Versnjak J, Yevtushenko P, Kuehne T, Bruening J, Goubergrits L Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1288339.

PMID: 38449784 PMC: 10916009. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1288339.


Novel Techniques in Imaging Congenital Heart Disease: JACC Scientific Statement.

Sachdeva R, Armstrong A, Arnaout R, Grosse-Wortmann L, Han B, Mertens L J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024; 83(1):63-81.

PMID: 38171712 PMC: 10947556. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.025.

References
1.
Yu K, Zhang C, Berry G, Altman R, Re C, Rubin D . Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:12474. PMC: 4990706. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12474. View

2.
Tabassian M, Sunderji I, Erdei T, Sanchez-Martinez S, Degiovanni A, Marino P . Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Machine Learning of Spatiotemporal Variations in Left Ventricular Deformation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018; 31(12):1272-1284.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.07.013. View

3.
Annabi M, Touboul E, Dahou A, Burwash I, Bergler-Klein J, Enriquez-Sarano M . Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography for Management of Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71(5):475-485. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.052. View

4.
Weese J, Lungu A, Peters J, Weber F, Waechter-Stehle I, Hose D . CFD- and Bernoulli-based pressure drop estimates: A comparison using patient anatomies from heart and aortic valve segmentation of CT images. Med Phys. 2017; 44(6):2281-2292. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12203. View

5.
Dey D, Slomka P, Leeson P, Comaniciu D, Shrestha S, Sengupta P . Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73(11):1317-1335. PMC: 6474254. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.054. View