» Articles » PMID: 36937213

Comparative Study for Osteosynthesis of Femoral Neck Fractures: Cannulated Screws Versus Femoral Neck System

Overview
Journal Hip Pelvis
Date 2023 Mar 20
PMID 36937213
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the radiological results of fixation using the femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated screw (CS) for treatment of femoral neck fractures.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective study of patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent internal fixation and had follow-up of more than six months from 2010 to 2020 was conducted. A total of 87 patients were enrolled in the study. The FNS group included 20 patients and the CS group included 67 patients. Classification of fractures was performed according to Garden and Pauwels classification. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, sliding distance of the implant, lateral soft tissue irritation caused by implants, and complications were evaluated.

Results: The mean operation time was 40.30 minutes in the FNS group and 46.84 minutes in the CS group. The mean intraoperative bleeding volume was 51.25 mL in the FNS group and 72.16 mL in the CS group. Bone union was achieved in 18 patients in the FNS group (90.0%) and in 61 patients in the CS group (91.0%). The mean sliding distance of the implant was 4.06 mm in the FNS group and 3.92 mm in the CS group. No patients in the FNS group and 12 patients in the CS group complained of soft tissue irritation.

Conclusion: A shorter operative time, less intraoperative bleeding, and less irritation of soft tissue were observed in the FNS group. FNS could be an alternative to CS for fixation of femoral neck fractures.

Citing Articles

Femoral neck system (FNS) versus 4 cannulated compression screws (CCSs) in the treatment of young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: a retrospective comparative study.

Gao Y, Ma T, Chang X, Jia P, Li X, Tang X J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):65.

PMID: 39827144 PMC: 11742197. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05461-4.


Comparison of the Surgical Outcome between the Multiple Screw Fixation and Fixed Angle Devices for the Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures.

Kim J, Park J, Kim H, Kim T, Yoo J, Lee Y Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(5).

PMID: 38792863 PMC: 11123322. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60050680.


Femoral Neck Fractures Treated by Closed Reduction and Internal Fixation with the Double Fluoroscope Technique: A Preliminary Study.

Lee H, Kang K, Sung S, Lee S, Kim S, Jung S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592215 PMC: 10932226. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051418.

References
1.
. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994; 843:1-129. View

2.
Madsen F, Linde F, Andersen E, Birke H, Hvass I, Poulsen T . Fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures. A comparison between sliding screw plate and four cancellous bone screws. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987; 58(3):212-6. DOI: 10.3109/17453678709146468. View

3.
Hsu M, Shu H, Luksameearunothai K, Margalit A, Yu A, Hasenboehler E . Is there an increased risk for subtrochanteric stress fracture with the Femoral Neck System versus multiple cannulated screws fixation?. J Orthop. 2022; 30:127-133. PMC: 8907549. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.016. View

4.
Liporace F, Gaines R, Collinge C, Haidukewych G . Results of internal fixation of Pauwels type-3 vertical femoral neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(8):1654-9. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01353. View

5.
Hu H, Cheng J, Feng M, Gao Z, Wu J, Lu S . Clinical outcome of femoral neck system versus cannulated compression screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in younger patients. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1):370. PMC: 8188789. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02517-z. View