The Effect of Action Observation Combined with High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Performance in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal Front Hum Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2023 Mar 20

PMID 36936614

Authors

Gidon Schwell

Zvi Kozol

David Tarshansky

Moshe Einat

Silvi Frenkel-Toledo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Action observation (AO) can improve motor performance in humans, probably the human mirror neuron system. In addition, there is some evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can improve motor performance. However, it is yet to be determined whether AO combined with tDCS has an enhanced effect on motor performance. We investigated the effect of AO combined with high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) targeting the inferior parietal lobe (IPL) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), the main aggregates of the human mirror neuron system, on motor performance in healthy adults and compared the immediate vs. 24-h retention test effects (anodal electrodes were placed over these regions of interest). Sixty participants were randomly divided into three groups that received one of the following single-session interventions: (1) observation of a video clip that presented reaching movement sequences toward five lighted units + active HD-tDCS stimulation (AO + active HD-tDCS group); (2) observation of a video clip that presented the same reaching movement sequences + sham HD-tDCS stimulation (AO + sham HD-tDCS group); and (3) observation of a video clip that presented neutral movie while receiving sham stimulation (NM + sham HD-tDCS group). Subjects' reaching performance was tested before and immediately after each intervention and following 24 h. Subjects performed reaching movements toward units that were activated in the same order as the observed sequence during pretest, posttest, and retest. Occasionally, the sequence order was changed by beginning the sequence unexpectedly with a different activated unit. Outcome measures included mean Reaching Time and difference between the Reaching Time of the unexpected and expected reaching movements (Delta). In the posttest and retest, Reaching Time and Delta improved in the AO + sham HD-tDCS group compared to the NM + HD-sham tDCS group. In addition, at posttest, Delta improved in the AO + active HD-tDCS group compared to the NM + sham HD-tDCS group. It appears that combining a montage of active HD-tDCS, which targets the IPL and IFG, with AO interferes with the positive effects of AO alone on the performance of reaching movement sequences.

Citing Articles

Focal muscle vibration and action observation: a combined approach for muscle strengthening.

Azzollini V, Fragapane N, Baster Z, Carozzo S, Dalise S, Chisari C Eur J Transl Myol. 2024; 34(3).

PMID: 39228230 PMC: 11487624. DOI: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12366.

Action Observation and Motor Imagery as a Treatment in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Mezzarobba S, Bonassi G, Avanzino L, Pelosin E J Parkinsons Dis. 2024; 14(s1):S53-S64.

PMID: 38250785 PMC: 11380291. DOI: 10.3233/JPD-230219.

Dual-hemisphere anodal transcranial direct current stimulation improves bilateral motor synergies.

Lee H, Lee J, Lee T, Ko D, Kang N Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1211034.

PMID: 37546450 PMC: 10400310. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211034.

References

Aron A, Fletcher P, Bullmore E, Sahakian B, Robbins T . Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 6(2):115-6. DOI: 10.1038/nn1003. View

Osman M, Bird G, Heyes C . Action observation supports effector-dependent learning of finger movement sequences. Exp Brain Res. 2005; 165(1):19-27. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2275-0. View

Borges L, Fernandes A, Oliveira Dos Passos J, Rego I, Campos T . Action observation for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 8:CD011887. PMC: 9354942. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011887.pub3. View

Rizzolatti G, Craighero L . The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004; 27:169-92. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230. View

Buccino G . Action observation treatment: a novel tool in neurorehabilitation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014; 369(1644):20130185. PMC: 4006186. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0185. View

Fogassi L, Ferrari P, Gesierich B, Rozzi S, Chersi F, Rizzolatti G . Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science. 2005; 308(5722):662-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1106138. View

Parkin B, Bhandari M, Glen J, Walsh V . The physiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation do not apply to parameters commonly used in studies of cognitive neuromodulation. Neuropsychologia. 2018; 128:332-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.030. View

Lee D, Roh H, Park J, Lee S, Han S . Drinking behavior training for stroke patients using action observation and practice of upper limb function. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013; 25(5):611-4. PMC: 3804965. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.25.611. View

di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G . Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res. 1992; 91(1):176-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF00230027. View

10.

Swissa Y, Hacohen S, Friedman J, Frenkel-Toledo S . Sensorimotor performance after high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary somatosensory or motor cortices in men versus women. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):11117. PMC: 9249866. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15226-2. View

11.

Kemmerer D . What modulates the Mirror Neuron System during action observation?: Multiple factors involving the action, the actor, the observer, the relationship between actor and observer, and the context. Prog Neurobiol. 2021; 205:102128. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102128. View

12.

Laakso I, Tanaka S, Koyama S, De Santis V, Hirata A . Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS. Brain Stimul. 2015; 8(5):906-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.05.002. View

13.

Charvet L, Dobbs B, Shaw M, Bikson M, Datta A, Krupp L . Remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Results from a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Mult Scler. 2017; 24(13):1760-1769. PMC: 5975187. DOI: 10.1177/1352458517732842. View

14.

Sarasso E, Gemma M, Agosta F, Filippi M, Gatti R . Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review. Arch Physiother. 2018; 5:14. PMC: 5759925. DOI: 10.1186/s40945-015-0013-x. View

15.

Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley J . Brain regions with mirror properties: a meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 36(1):341-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.004. View

16.

Grezes J, Armony J, Rowe J, Passingham R . Activations related to "mirror" and "canonical" neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2003; 18(4):928-37. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00042-9. View

17.

Frenkel-Toledo S, Einat M, Kozol Z . The Effects of Instruction Manipulation on Motor Performance Following Action Observation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:33. PMC: 7073404. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00033. View

18.

Lerner O, Friedman J, Frenkel-Toledo S . The effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation intensity on motor performance in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021; 18(1):103. PMC: 8236155. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00899-z. View

19.

Buccino G, Gatti R, Giusti M, Negrotti A, Rossi A, Calzetti S . Action observation treatment improves autonomy in daily activities in Parkinson's disease patients: results from a pilot study. Mov Disord. 2011; 26(10):1963-4. DOI: 10.1002/mds.23745. View

20.

Batsikadze G, Moliadze V, Paulus W, Kuo M, Nitsche M . Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J Physiol. 2013; 591(7):1987-2000. PMC: 3624864. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730. View