» Articles » PMID: 36936363

Associations Among Hip Structure, Bone Mineral Density, and Strength Vary With External Bone Size in White Women

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) is heavily relied upon to reflect structural changes affecting hip strength and fracture risk. Strong correlations between BMD and strength are needed to provide confidence that structural changes are reflected in BMD and, in turn, strength. This study investigated how variation in bone structure gives rise to variation in BMD and strength and tested whether these associations differ with external bone size. Cadaveric proximal femurs ( = 30, White women, 36-89+ years) were imaged using nanocomputed tomography (nano-CT) and loaded in a sideways fall configuration to assess bone strength and brittleness. Bone voxels within the nano-CT images were projected onto a plane to create pseudo dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (pseudo-DXA) images consistent with a clinical DXA scan. A validation study using 19 samples confirmed pseudo-DXA measures correlated significantly with those measured from a commercially available DXA system, including bone mineral content (BMC) (  = 0.95), area (  = 0.58), and BMD (  = 0.92). BMD-strength associations were conducted using multivariate linear regression analyses with the samples divided into narrow and wide groups by pseudo-DXA area. Nearly 80% of the variation in strength was explained by age, body weight, and pseudo-DXA BMD for the narrow subgroup. Including additional structural or density distribution information in regression models only modestly improved the correlations. In contrast, age, body weight, and pseudo-DXA BMD explained only half of the variation in strength for the wide subgroup. Including bone density distribution or structural details did not improve the correlations, but including post-yield deflection (PYD), a measure of bone material brittleness, did increase the coefficient of determination to more than 70% for the wide subgroup. This outcome suggested material level effects play an important role in the strength of wide femoral necks. Thus, the associations among structure, BMD, and strength differed with external bone size, providing evidence that structure-function relationships may be improved by judiciously sorting study cohorts into subgroups. © 2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Citing Articles

Structural differences contributing to sex-specific associations between FN BMD and whole-bone strength for adult White women and men.

Jepsen K, Bigelow E, Goulet R, Nolan B, Casden M, Kennedy K JBMR Plus. 2024; 8(4):ziae013.

PMID: 38523663 PMC: 10958990. DOI: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae013.


Characterizing Bone Phenotypes Related to Skeletal Fragility Using Advanced Medical Imaging.

Whittier D, Bevers M, Geusens P, van den Bergh J, Gabel L Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2023; 21(6):685-697.

PMID: 37884821 PMC: 10724303. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-023-00830-6.

References
1.
Jepsen K, Kozminski A, Bigelow E, Schlecht S, Goulet R, Harlow S . Femoral Neck External Size but not aBMD Predicts Structural and Mass Changes for Women Transitioning Through Menopause. J Bone Miner Res. 2017; 32(6):1218-1228. PMC: 5466474. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3082. View

2.
Mittra E, Rubin C, Gruber B, Qin Y . Evaluation of trabecular mechanical and microstructural properties in human calcaneal bone of advanced age using mechanical testing, microCT, and DXA. J Biomech. 2007; 41(2):368-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.003. View

3.
Link T, Vieth V, Langenberg R, Meier N, Lotter A, Newitt D . Structure analysis of high resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal femur: in vitro correlation with biomechanical strength and BMD. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002; 72(2):156-65. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-001-2132-5. View

4.
Villamor E, Monserrat C, Del Rio L, Romero-Martin J, Ruperez M . Prediction of osteoporotic hip fracture in postmenopausal women through patient-specific FE analyses and machine learning. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020; 193:105484. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105484. View

5.
Zhang F, Tan L, Lei S, Deng H . The differences of femoral neck geometric parameters: effects of age, gender and race. Osteoporos Int. 2009; 21(7):1205-14. PMC: 2921984. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1057-0. View