» Articles » PMID: 36928816

A Longitudinal Circulating Tumor DNA-based Model Associated with Survival in Metastatic Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Abstract

One of the great challenges in therapeutic oncology is determining who might achieve survival benefits from a particular therapy. Studies on longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics for the prediction of survival have generally been small or nonrandomized. We assessed ctDNA across 5 time points in 466 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients from the randomized phase 3 IMpower150 study comparing chemotherapy-immune checkpoint inhibitor (chemo-ICI) combinations and used machine learning to jointly model multiple ctDNA metrics to predict overall survival (OS). ctDNA assessments through cycle 3 day 1 of treatment enabled risk stratification of patients with stable disease (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.2 (2.0-5.3), P < 0.001; median 7.1 versus 22.3 months for high- versus low-intermediate risk) and with partial response (HR = 3.3 (1.7-6.4), P < 0.001; median 8.8 versus 28.6 months). The model also identified high-risk patients in an external validation cohort from the randomized phase 3 OAK study of ICI versus chemo in NSCLC (OS HR = 3.73 (1.83-7.60), P = 0.00012). Simulations of clinical trial scenarios employing our ctDNA model suggested that early ctDNA testing outperforms early radiographic imaging for predicting trial outcomes. Overall, measuring ctDNA dynamics during treatment can improve patient risk stratification and may allow early differentiation between competing therapies during clinical trials.

Citing Articles

Early Circulating Tumor DNA Kinetics as a Dynamic Biomarker of Cancer Treatment Response.

Li A, Lou E, Leder K, Foo J JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025; 9:e2400160.

PMID: 40053881 PMC: 11895822. DOI: 10.1200/CCI-24-00160.


Putting comprehensive genomic profiling of ctDNA to work: 10 proposed use cases.

Desai A, Pasquina L, Nulsen C, Keller-Evans R, Mata D, Tukachinsky H J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 4:100140.

PMID: 40027147 PMC: 11863816. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100140.


Clinical application of liquid biopsy genomic profiling in NSCLC: Asian perspectives.

Li M, Mok K, Chan L, Mok T J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 3:100131.

PMID: 40026566 PMC: 11863888. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2023.100131.


Advancing Precision Oncology Through Modeling of Longitudinal and Multimodal Data.

Zhuang L, Park S, Skates S, Prosper A, Aberle D, Hsu W ArXiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990791 PMC: 11844620.


Dynamics of blood microsatellite instability (bMSI) burden predicts outcome of a patient treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a case report of hyperprogressive disease.

Kravchuk D, Lebedeva A, Kuznetsova O, Kavun A, Taraskina A, Belova E Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1492296.

PMID: 39975556 PMC: 11836019. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1492296.


References
1.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. View

2.
Fojo A, Noonan A . Why RECIST works and why it should stay--counterpoint. Cancer Res. 2012; 72(20):5151-7. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0733. View

3.
Chiou V, Burotto M . Pseudoprogression and Immune-Related Response in Solid Tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(31):3541-3. PMC: 4622096. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6870. View

4.
Tazdait M, Mezquita L, Lahmar J, Ferrara R, Bidault F, Ammari S . Patterns of responses in metastatic NSCLC during PD-1 or PDL-1 inhibitor therapy: Comparison of RECIST 1.1, irRECIST and iRECIST criteria. Eur J Cancer. 2017; 88:38-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.017. View

5.
Petrelli F, Ghidini M, Costanzo A, Rampulla V, Varricchio A, Tomasello G . Surrogate endpoints in immunotherapy trials for solid tumors. Ann Transl Med. 2019; 7(7):154. PMC: 6511564. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.03.20. View