» Articles » PMID: 36927571

Threat and Reward Imminence Processing in the Human Brain

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Mar 17
PMID 36927571
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. In addition, the extent to which aversive-related and appetitive-related processing engage distinct or overlapping circuits remains poorly understood. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive and appetitive processing while male and female participants engaged in comparable trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. For example, in the aversive domain, we predicted that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), but not the amygdala, would exhibit anticipatory responses given the role of the former in anxious apprehension. We also predicted that the periaqueductal gray (PAG) would exhibit threat-proximity responses based on its involvement in proximal-threat processes, and that the ventral striatum would exhibit threat-imminence responses given its role in threat escape in rodents. Overall, we uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the BST, PAG, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Whereas the ventral striatum generated anticipatory responses in the proximity of reward as expected, it also exhibited threat-related imminence responses. In fact, across multiple brain regions, we observed a main effect of arousal. In other words, we uncovered extensive temporally evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information regardless of valence, findings further supported by network analysis. In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive/appetitive processing while participants engaged in trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. We uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, periaqueductal gray, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Overall, we uncovered extensive temporally evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information regardless of valence.

Citing Articles

Approach-avoidance conflict recruits lateral frontoparietal and cinguloinsular networks in a predator-prey game setting.

Ni Y, Potter R, James T Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025; .

PMID: 40011405 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-025-01278-0.


Adolescent social anxiety is associated with diminished discrimination of anticipated threat and safety in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.

Hur J, Tillman R, Kim H, Didier P, Anderson A, Islam S J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024; 134(1):41-56.

PMID: 39509181 PMC: 11748169. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000940.


Persistent Threat Avoidance Following Negative Reinforcement Is Not Associated with Elevated State Anxiety.

Crummy E, Chamberlain B, Gamboa J, Pierson J, Ahmari S J Neurosci. 2024; 45(2.

PMID: 39505409 PMC: 11714351. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0815-24.2024.


How Distributed Subcortical Integration of Reward and Threat May Inform Subsequent Approach-Avoidance Decisions.

Hulsman A, Klaassen F, de Voogd L, Roelofs K, Klumpers F J Neurosci. 2024; 44(48).

PMID: 39379152 PMC: 11604143. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0794-24.2024.


A shared threat-anticipation circuit is dynamically engaged at different moments by certain and uncertain threat.

Cornwell B, Didier P, Grogans S, Anderson A, Islam S, Kim H bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39026814 PMC: 11257510. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.10.602972.


References
1.
Pauli W, Nili A, Michael Tyszka J . A high-resolution probabilistic in vivo atlas of human subcortical brain nuclei. Sci Data. 2018; 5:180063. PMC: 5903366. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.63. View

2.
Wen Z, Raio C, Pace-Schott E, Lazar S, LeDoux J, Phelps E . Temporally and anatomically specific contributions of the human amygdala to threat and safety learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(26):e2204066119. PMC: 9245701. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2204066119. View

3.
Meyer H, Odriozola P, Cohodes E, Mandell J, Li A, Yang R . Ventral hippocampus interacts with prelimbic cortex during inhibition of threat response via learned safety in both mice and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(52):26970-26979. PMC: 6936350. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1910481116. View

4.
Rodriguez-Romaguera J, Ung R, Nomura H, Otis J, Basiri M, Namboodiri V . Prepronociceptin-Expressing Neurons in the Extended Amygdala Encode and Promote Rapid Arousal Responses to Motivationally Salient Stimuli. Cell Rep. 2020; 33(6):108362. PMC: 8136285. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108362. View

5.
Faillenot I, Heckemann R, Frot M, Hammers A . Macroanatomy and 3D probabilistic atlas of the human insula. Neuroimage. 2017; 150:88-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.073. View