» Articles » PMID: 36925609

Improving Welfare Assessment in Aquaculture

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2023 Mar 17
PMID 36925609
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While global aquaculture is rapidly expanding, there remains little attention given to the assessment of animal welfare within aquacultural systems. It is crucial that animal welfare concerns are central in the development and implementation of aquaculture as if they are not prioritized early on, it becomes much more difficult to adapt in future. To this end, it is important to ensure the availability of high-quality welfare assessment schemes to evaluate the welfare of animals in aquaculture and promote and maintain high welfare standards. This paper will first discuss some of the current certification and assessment frameworks, highlighting the primary limitations that need to be addressed, before going on to describe the recommendations for a best-practice welfare assessment process for aquaculture; with the hope that these considerations can be taken on board and used to help improve welfare assessment for aquaculture and, ultimately, to ensure animals used in aquaculture have a higher level of welfare. Any aquacultural system should be assessed according to a suitable framework in order to be considered adequate for the welfare of the animals it contains, and thus to maintain social license to operate.

Citing Articles

Considerations for implementing regulation of decapods in science.

Powell A, Agnalt A, Heasman K, Albalat A Anim Welf. 2024; 33:e55.

PMID: 39703221 PMC: 11655277. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2024.50.


Sustainability of animal-sourced foods and plant-based alternatives.

Qaim M, Barrangou R, Ronald P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(50):e2400495121.

PMID: 39621912 PMC: 11648610. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2400495121.


Differential Reshaping of Skin and Intestinal Microbiota by Stocking Density and Oxygen Availability in Farmed Gilthead Sea Bream (): A Behavioral and Network-Based Integrative Approach.

Toxqui-Rodriguez S, Holhorea P, Naya-Catala F, Calduch-Giner J, Sitja-Bobadilla A, Piazzon C Microorganisms. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39065128 PMC: 11278760. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12071360.


Qualitative Behavioural Assessment as a welfare indicator for farmed Atlantic salmon ( in response to a stressful challenge.

Wiese T, Rey Planellas S, Betancor M, Haskell M, Jarvis S, Davie A Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1260090.

PMID: 37841467 PMC: 10569038. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1260090.


Assessment of Tilapia ( spp.) Welfare in the Semi-Intensive and Intensive Culture Systems in Thailand.

Lertwanakarn T, Purimayata T, Luengyosluechakul T, Grimalt P, Pedrazzani A, Quintiliano M Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(15).

PMID: 37570306 PMC: 10416865. DOI: 10.3390/ani13152498.

References
1.
Patel F, Wemelsfelder F, Ward S . Using Qualitative Behaviour Assessment to Investigate Human-Animal Relationships in Zoo-Housed Giraffes (). Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(6). PMC: 6616931. DOI: 10.3390/ani9060381. View

2.
Brown C . Fish intelligence, sentience and ethics. Anim Cogn. 2014; 18(1):1-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0761-0. View

3.
Heinola K, Kauppinen T, Niemi J, Wallenius E, Raussi S . Comparison of 12 Different Animal Welfare Labeling Schemes in the Pig Sector. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(8). PMC: 8388749. DOI: 10.3390/ani11082430. View

4.
Gomez Y, Stygar A, Boumans I, Bokkers E, Pedersen L, Niemi J . A Systematic Review on Validated Precision Livestock Farming Technologies for Pig Production and Its Potential to Assess Animal Welfare. Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:660565. PMC: 8160240. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.660565. View

5.
Mellor D, Beausoleil N, Littlewood K, McLean A, McGreevy P, Jones B . The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human-Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(10). PMC: 7602120. DOI: 10.3390/ani10101870. View