» Articles » PMID: 36925584

Smallest Chimeras Under Repulsive Interactions

Overview
Date 2023 Mar 17
PMID 36925584
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present an exemplary system of three identical oscillators in a ring interacting repulsively to show up chimera patterns. The dynamics of individual oscillators is governed by the superconducting Josephson junction. Surprisingly, the repulsive interactions can only establish a symmetry of complete synchrony in the ring, which is broken with increasing repulsive interactions when the junctions pass through serials of asynchronous states (periodic and chaotic) but finally emerge into chimera states. The chimera pattern first appears in chaotic rotational motion of the three junctions when two junctions evolve coherently, while the third junction is incoherent. For larger repulsive coupling, the junctions evolve into another chimera pattern in a periodic state when two junctions remain coherent in rotational motion and one junction transits to incoherent librational motion. This chimera pattern is sensitive to initial conditions in the sense that the chimera state flips to another pattern when two junctions switch to coherent librational motion and the third junction remains in rotational motion, but incoherent. The chimera patterns are detected by using partial and global error functions of the junctions, while the librational and rotational motions are identified by a libration index. All the collective states, complete synchrony, desynchronization, and two chimera patterns are delineated in a parameter plane of the ring of junctions, where the boundaries of complete synchrony are demarcated by using the master stability function.

References
1.
Sethia G, Sen A . Chimera states: the existence criteria revisited. Phys Rev Lett. 2014; 112(14):144101. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.144101. View

2.
Laing C . Dynamics and stability of chimera states in two coupled populations of oscillators. Phys Rev E. 2019; 100(4-1):042211. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.042211. View

3.
Abrams D, Strogatz S . Chimera states for coupled oscillators. Phys Rev Lett. 2004; 93(17):174102. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.174102. View

4.
Majhi S, Bera B, Ghosh D, Perc M . Chimera states in neuronal networks: A review. Phys Life Rev. 2018; 28:100-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.09.003. View

5.
Mishra A, Hens C, Bose M, Roy P, Dana S . Chimeralike states in a network of oscillators under attractive and repulsive global coupling. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2016; 92(6):062920. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.062920. View