» Articles » PMID: 36923600

Comparison of PSMA-based F-DCFPyL PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP Bone Scan in Detection of Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer

Overview
Date 2023 Mar 16
PMID 36923600
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While Tc-99m MDP bone scan (BS) remains the conventional standard for detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer, newly FDA-approved imaging with PSMA-based F-DCFPyL PET/CT has shown promise for early detection of metastatic disease. However, a paucity of data remains in the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in detecting bone metastasis compared to BS. This retrospective study included 91 patients who received both BS and PSMA PET/CT within a 3-month interval from August 2021 to February 2022. Separate concurrent primary cancer, interval PSA levels greater than a 2-fold difference (or absolute difference >1 ng/ml) between the two studies were excluded. All abnormal bone lesions on either scan were compared. The findings were verified by pathological findings and/or 6-month clinical follow-up. High concordance (78%) was found between modalities with discordant findings (20/91, 22%) demonstrating more false positives (4/20, 20%) and false negatives (3/20, 15%) on BS compared to PET/CT. Additionally, more bone metastases were detected on PSMA PET/CT (13/20, 65%) with all true positive BS lesions also detected PET/CT. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for BS were 89%, 91%, 80%, and 95% respectively; and 100%, 97%, 93%, and 100% for F-DCFPyL PET/CT respectively. Our results demonstrate that F-DCFPyL PET/CT identified more bone metastases while also identifying all bone metastases identified on BS. With the added diagnostic value of detecting primary tumor and soft tissue metastasis, F-DCFPyL PET/CT may render BS unnecessary to investigate bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

Performance of PSMA-PET/CT as verified by bone biopsy for diagnosing osseous metastases of prostate cancer.

Ou W, Jennings J, Northrup B, Dettorre G, Winkler W, Imaoka R Skeletal Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39704796 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04855-5.


Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET versus [Tc]Tc-MDP bone scan for diagnosing bone metastasis in prostate cancer: a head-to-head comparative meta-analysis.

Wang Y, Qiu Y, Yan X Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1451565.

PMID: 39386742 PMC: 11461218. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1451565.


Noninvasive PET imaging of tumor PD-L1 expression with Cu-labeled Durvalumab.

Malih S, Lin W, Tang Z, DeLuca M, Engle J, Alirezapour B Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 14(1):31-40.

PMID: 38500749 PMC: 10944374.

References
1.
Hofman M, Lawrentschuk N, Francis R, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P . Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10231):1208-1216. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7. View

2.
Azad G, Taylor B, Rubello D, Colletti P, Goh V, Cook G . Molecular and Functional Imaging of Bone Metastases in Breast and Prostate Cancers: An Overview. Clin Nucl Med. 2015; 41(1):e44-50. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000993. View

3.
Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber R, Barregard L, Bhutta Z, Brenner H . Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 3(4):524-548. PMC: 6103527. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688. View

4.
Nozaki T, Yasuda K, Akashi T, Fuse H . Usefulness of single photon emission computed tomography imaging in the detection of lumbar vertebral metastases from prostate cancer. Int J Urol. 2008; 15(6):516-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02028.x. View

5.
Rowe S, Mana-Ay M, Javadi M, Szabo Z, Leal J, Pomper M . PSMA-Based Detection of Prostate Cancer Bone Lesions With ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT: A Sensitive Alternative to (⁹⁹m)Tc-MDP Bone Scan and Na¹⁸F PET/CT?. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015; 14(1):e115-8. PMC: 4698229. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.09.011. View