» Articles » PMID: 36923561

Surface Microstructure of Two Bioceramics: Calcium-Enriched Mixture and Cold Ceramic in Setting Environments with Different PH Values

Overview
Journal Int J Dent
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Mar 16
PMID 36923561
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The pH of the setting environment could alter the surface characteristics of bioceramics. The present study aimed to assess the surface microstructure of calcium-enriched mixture (CEM cement) and cold ceramic (CC) in setting environments with different pH values.

Materials And Methods: 12 dentin blocks with 3 mm height and internal diameter were prepared. CEM cement and CC were prepared and packed into the blocks. Samples in each bioceramics group ( = 6) were divided into 3 subgroups ( = 2) and exposed to acid, pH of 7.4, and alkaline pH for 1 week. Specimens were prepared for evaluation under a scanning electron microscope using backscattered electron (BSE) detectors. Monitoring of pH changes was rendered with a pH meter through the setting process.

Results: BSE detection in an acidic environment showed more amorphous microstructures in CC specimens in comparison to CEM cement. In pH of 7.4 and alkaline pH, more unhydrated structures were observed in CEM cement compared with CC samples. During the first 48 h of the setting process, the pH changes of setting environments were more rapid in the CEM cement group in comparison to CC samples.

Conclusion: pH changes during the setting process of cement could affect the surface microstructure and physical properties. In acidic environments, the crystallization of CC cement is more disrupted than that of CEM cement.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive review of composition, properties, clinical applications, and future perspectives of calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement: a systematic analysis.

Asgary S, Aram M, Fazlyab M Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):96.

PMID: 39294680 PMC: 11409725. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01290-4.


The Role of Bioceramics for Bone Regeneration: History, Mechanisms, and Future Perspectives.

Tanvir M, Khaleque M, Kim G, Yoo W, Kim Y Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 38667241 PMC: 11048714. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9040230.

References
1.
Shie M, Huang T, Kao C, Huang C, Ding S . The effect of a physiologic solution pH on properties of white mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2008; 35(1):98-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.09.015. View

2.
Camilleri J . Hydration mechanisms of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J. 2007; 40(6):462-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01248.x. View

3.
Stefopoulos S, Tsatsas D, Kerezoudis N, Eliades G . Comparative in vitro study of the sealing efficiency of white vs grey ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate formulas as apical barriers. Dent Traumatol. 2008; 24(2):207-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2007.00516.x. View

4.
Hasheminia M, Nejad S, Asgary S . Sealing Ability of MTA and CEM Cement as Root-End Fillings of Human Teeth in Dry, Saliva or Blood-Contaminated Conditions. Iran Endod J. 2012; 5(4):151-6. PMC: 3471573. View

5.
Hasheminia S, Nejad S, Dianat O, Modaresi J, Mahjour F . Comparing the sealing properties of mineral trioxide aggregate and an experimental ceramic based root end filling material in different environments. Indian J Dent Res. 2013; 24(4):474-7. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.118399. View