» Articles » PMID: 36923071

Mechanical Failures of Dental Implants and Supported Prostheses: A Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2023 Mar 16
PMID 36923071
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Though, mechanical dental implant and supported prosthesis failures are considered significant, a comprehensive evaluation is lacking. A systematic review analyzing different aspects related to such failures was therefore done.

Methods: Electronic search was carried out in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library for articles published between 1981 and 2021. Articles were selected using predefined criteria. Data extraction was based on mechanical complications associated with dental implants, prosthetic implant failures, survival rate of implants, mechanical failure of implants placed in the maxilla and mandible, and mechanical complications associated with implant supported over dentures. Quality of included studies was assessed. Meta-analysis for heterogenicity testing, publication bias and implant failure assessment was conducted using MedCalc® Statistical Software version 19.7.

Results: Eighteen retrospective and prospective studies were included following PRISMA guidelines. Mechanical complications were more in the initial 9 years but reduced later. Abutment screw loosening was one of the more common mechanical complications (16.21%). Maxillary implant failure was greater compared to mandibular implant failure with an odds ratio of 4.66 (95% CI -3.21- 6.75). Failure of implant supported overdentures due to mechanical complications were 3% in the fixed effect, and 2.9% in the random effect model ( < 0.05). The overall prevalence of mechanical failure was between 5.6% and 7.7% (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Mechanical failures of implant and supported prosthesis have similar prevalence to biological and esthetic failures, and therefore need to be given due credence. Identifying specific factors contributing to such failures can help reduce incidence.

Citing Articles

Dental Implant Survival Rates: Comprehensive Insights from a Large-Scale Electronic Dental Registry.

Tobias G, Chackartchi T, Haim D, Mann J, Findler M J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16(2).

PMID: 39997593 PMC: 11856851. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16020060.


Optimizing dental implant identification using deep learning leveraging artificial data.

Sukegawa S, Yoshii K, Hara T, Tanaka F, Taki Y, Inoue Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3724.

PMID: 39880861 PMC: 11779872. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87579-3.


Implant Mechanics, Biological Milieu, and Peri-Implantitis: A Narrative Review.

Mariam S, Kshirsagar R, Hasan S, Khadtare Y, Rajpurohit K, Rai H Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67173.

PMID: 39295709 PMC: 11409158. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67173.


Clinical Factors on Dental Implant Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Manfredini M, Poli P, Giboli L, Beretta M, Maiorana C, Pellegrini M Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39056987 PMC: 11276356. DOI: 10.3390/dj12070200.


Pioneering nanomedicine in orthopedic treatment care: a review of current research and practices.

Liang W, Zhou C, Zhang H, Bai J, Long H, Jiang B Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1389071.

PMID: 38860139 PMC: 11163052. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1389071.


References
1.
Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson A . Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol. 1988; 59(5):287-96. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287. View

2.
Lee H, Jo M, Noh G . Biomechanical effects of dental implant diameter, connection type, and bone density on microgap formation and fatigue failure: A finite element analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020; 200:105863. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105863. View

3.
Zarb G, Schmitt A . The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64(2):185-94. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-e. View

4.
el Askary A, Meffert R, Griffin T . Why do dental implants fail? Part II. Implant Dent. 2000; 8(3):265-77. DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199903000-00008. View

5.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021; 10(1):89. PMC: 8008539. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4. View