» Articles » PMID: 36922411

Causes and Associations with Mortality in Patients with Pelvic Ring Injuries with Haemorrhagic Shock

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Mar 16
PMID 36922411
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: High energy pelvic ring injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and can be accompanied by haemorrhagic shock following associated vascular injury. This study evaluated the causes and predictors of mortality in haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.

Methods: This retrospective observational study at a Major Trauma Centre reviewed 938 consecutive adult patients (≥ 18yrs) with pelvic ring injuries between December 2014 and November 2018. Patients with features of haemorrhagic shock were included, defined as: arrival Systolic BP < 90 mmHg, Base Deficit ≥ 6.0 mmol/l, or transfusion of ≥ 4 units of packed red blood cells within 24 h.

Results: Of the 102 patients included, all sustained injuries from high energy trauma, and 47.1% underwent a haemorrhage control intervention (Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta-REBOA, Interventional Radiology-IR, or Laparotomy). These were more often required following vertical shear injuries (OR 10.7, p = 0.036). Overall, 33 patients (32.4%) died; 16 due to a head injury, and only 2 directly from acute pelvic exsanguination (6.1%). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that increasing age, Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) Head ≥ 3 and open pelvic fracture were all independent predictors of mortality, and IR was associated with reduced mortality. Lateral Compression III (LC3) injuries were associated with mortality due to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).

Conclusion: Haemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic ring injuries have a high mortality rate, but death is usually attributed to other injuries or later complications, and not from acute exsanguination. This reflects improvements in resuscitative care, transfusion protocols, and haemorrhage control techniques.

Citing Articles

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic outbreak on pelvic trauma surgical management.

Pielak T, Zabrzynska M, Wojcicki R, Erdmann J, Walus P, Malkowski B Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6323.

PMID: 39984649 PMC: 11845521. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90895-3.


Impact of "hypotension on arrival" on required surgical disciplines and usage of damage control protocols in severely injured patients.

Witzenhausen M, Hossfeld B, Kulla M, Beltzer C Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024; 32(1):44.

PMID: 38745198 PMC: 11094980. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-024-01187-0.


Immediate management of a stable patient with unstable pelvis.

Cano J, Bogallo J, Ramirez A, Guerado E EFORT Open Rev. 2024; 9(5):434-447.

PMID: 38726989 PMC: 11099580. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-24-0055.

References
1.
White C, Hsu J, Holcomb J . Haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Injury. 2009; 40(10):1023-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.11.023. View

2.
Costantini T, Coimbra R, Holcomb J, Podbielski J, Catalano R, Blackburn A . Current management of hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures: Results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 80(5):717-23. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001034. View

3.
Costantini T, Coimbra R, Holcomb J, Podbielski J, Catalano R, Blackburn A . Pelvic fracture pattern predicts the need for hemorrhage control intervention-Results of an AAST multi-institutional study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017; 82(6):1030-1038. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001465. View

4.
Jang J, Bae K, Chang S, Jung K, Kim D, Kang B . Current management and clinical outcomes for patients with haemorrhagic shock due to pelvic fracture in Korean regional trauma centres: A multi-institutional trial. Injury. 2021; 53(2):488-495. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.12.015. View

5.
Verbeek D, Verbeek D, Sugrue M, Balogh Z, Cass D, Civil I . Acute management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma patients: time for a change? Multicenter review of recent practice. World J Surg. 2008; 32(8):1874-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9591-z. View