» Articles » PMID: 36921925

Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Versus MRNA-1273 Covid-19 Vaccine Boosting in England: Matched Cohort Study in OpenSAFELY-TPP

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) covid-19 vaccines during the booster programme in England.

Design: Matched cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial.

Setting: Linked primary care, hospital, and covid-19 surveillance records available within the OpenSAFELY-TPP research platform, covering a period when the SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variants were dominant.

Participants: 3 237 918 adults who received a booster dose of either vaccine between 29 October 2021 and 25 February 2022 as part of the national booster programme in England and who received a primary course of BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1.

Intervention: Vaccination with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 as a booster vaccine dose.

Main Outcome Measures: Recorded SARS-CoV-2 positive test, covid-19 related hospital admission, covid-19 related death, and non-covid-19 related death at 20 weeks after receipt of the booster dose.

Results: 1 618 959 people were matched in each vaccine group, contributing a total 64 546 391 person weeks of follow-up. The 20 week risks per 1000 for a positive SARS-CoV-2 test were 164.2 (95% confidence interval 163.3 to 165.1) for BNT162b2 and 159.9 (159.0 to 160.8) for mRNA-1273; the hazard ratio comparing mRNA-1273 with BNT162b2 was 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.95 to 0.96). The 20 week risks per 1000 for hospital admission with covid-19 were 0.75 (0.71 to 0.79) for BNT162b2 and 0.65 (0.61 to 0.69) for mRNA-1273; the hazard ratio was 0.89 (0.82 to 0.95). Covid-19 related deaths were rare: the 20 week risks per 1000 were 0.028 (0.021 to 0.037) for BNT162b2 and 0.024 (0.018 to 0.033) for mRNA-1273; hazard ratio 0.83 (0.58 to 1.19). Comparative effectiveness was generally similar within subgroups defined by the primary course vaccine brand, age, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and clinical vulnerability. Relative benefit was similar when vaccines were compared separately in the delta and omicron variant eras.

Conclusions: This matched observational study of adults estimated a modest benefit of booster vaccination with mRNA-1273 compared with BNT162b2 in preventing positive SARS-CoV-2 tests and hospital admission with covid-19 20 weeks after vaccination, during a period of delta followed by omicron variant dominance.

Citing Articles

Substantial reduction in the clinical and economic burden of disease following variant-adapted mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients in France.

Lee A, Davido B, Beck E, Demont C, Joshi K, Kohli M Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024; 20(1):2423474.

PMID: 39540209 PMC: 11572258. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2423474.


Comparative Effectiveness of the Bivalent (Original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5) mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines mRNA-1273.222 and BNT162b2 Bivalent in Adults with Underlying Medical Conditions in the United States.

Kopel H, Nguyen V, Bogdanov A, Winer I, Boileau C, Ducruet T Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39460274 PMC: 11511346. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12101107.


Vaccine-induced humoral response of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 against BA.1, BA.5, and XBB.1.5. (sub)variants 6 months after a homologous booster: is immunogenicity equivalent?.

Favresse J, Tre-Hardy M, Gillot C, Cupaiolo R, Wilmet A, Beukinga I Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e36116.

PMID: 39247272 PMC: 11379571. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36116.


A Response to: A Letter to the Editor Regarding 'Comparative Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines Among Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Using the GRADE Framework'.

Beck E, Bausch-Jurken M, Van de Velde N, Wang X, Malmenas M Infect Dis Ther. 2024; 13(10):2195-2202.

PMID: 39180646 PMC: 11416437. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-01020-2.


Clinical coding of long COVID in primary care 2020-2023 in a cohort of 19 million adults: an OpenSAFELY analysis.

Henderson A, Butler-Cole B, Tazare J, Tomlinson L, Marks M, Jit M EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 72:102638.

PMID: 38800803 PMC: 11127160. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102638.


References
1.
Munro A, Janani L, Cornelius V, Aley P, Babbage G, Baxter D . Safety and immunogenicity of seven COVID-19 vaccines as a third dose (booster) following two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 or BNT162b2 in the UK (COV-BOOST): a blinded, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021; 398(10318):2258-2276. PMC: 8639161. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02717-3. View

2.
Klein N, Lewis N, Goddard K, Fireman B, Zerbo O, Hanson K . Surveillance for Adverse Events After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination. JAMA. 2021; 326(14):1390-1399. PMC: 8511971. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.15072. View

3.
Barda N, Dagan N, Cohen C, Hernan M, Lipsitch M, Kohane I . Effectiveness of a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for preventing severe outcomes in Israel: an observational study. Lancet. 2021; 398(10316):2093-2100. PMC: 8555967. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02249-2. View

4.
Lipsitch M, Tchetgen Tchetgen E, Cohen T . Negative controls: a tool for detecting confounding and bias in observational studies. Epidemiology. 2010; 21(3):383-8. PMC: 3053408. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181d61eeb. View

5.
Dickerman B, Madenci A, Gerlovin H, Kurgansky K, Wise J, Figueroa Muniz M . Comparative Safety of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in a Nationwide Cohort of US Veterans. JAMA Intern Med. 2022; 182(7):739-746. PMC: 9194743. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2109. View