» Articles » PMID: 36915803

Group-based Pulmonary Telerehabilitation is Feasible, Safe, Beneficial and Well-received in Patients Who Have Been Hospitalised with COVID-19

Overview
Journal ERJ Open Res
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2023 Mar 14
PMID 36915803
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused worldwide mass hospitalisation. The need for multidisciplinary post-hospitalisation rehabilitation is becoming increasingly apparent, and telerehabilitation has been endorsed. The aim of study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of pulmonary telerehabilitation for COVID-19 survivors.

Methods: This was a single-centre, mixed-methods, fast-track (wait-list), randomised controlled trial of telerehabilitation for patients who had been hospitalised with COVID-19. 40 patients discharged from two university teaching hospitals in the north of England were recruited. Telerehabilitation consisted of 12 exercise classes, six education events and opportunity for peer support. Patients commenced telerehabilitation 14 days after randomisation in the fast-track group and 56 days after randomisation in the wait-list group.

Outcome Measures And Results: Descriptive and statistical improvements were noted in several clinical outcome measures. Exercise capacity increased from a median (interquartile range) 20 (14-24) sit-to-stand repetitions in 1 min at baseline to 25 (24-30) post-telerehabilitation. Breathlessness rated using the Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale changed from 3.5 (3-4) at baseline to 2 (1.5-3) post-telerehabilitation, with additional favourable outcomes noted in respiratory symptoms measured using numerical rating scales and visual analogue scales (VAS). Quality of life measured using the EuroQol VAS improved from 55 (60-70) units at baseline to 70 (55-80) units following telerehabilitation. Improvements in fatigue (modified Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy: Fatigue) and mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression) were also observed. Natural recovery was observed in the wait-list group prior to receiving telerehabilitation; however, improvements were accelerated by early telerehabilitation in the fast-track group.

Conclusions: We have shown that group-based telerehabilitation is feasible, safe, beneficial and well-received in this population.

Citing Articles

Adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation across rehabilitation populations: A scoping review.

Yau T, Chan J, McIntyre M, Bhogal D, Andreoli A, Leochico C PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0313440.

PMID: 39561143 PMC: 11575805. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313440.

References
1.
Wade D . What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description. Clin Rehabil. 2020; 34(5):571-583. PMC: 7350200. DOI: 10.1177/0269215520905112. View

2.
Al-Shair K, Muellerova H, Yorke J, Rennard S, Wouters E, Hanania N . Examining fatigue in COPD: development, validity and reliability of a modified version of FACIT-F scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012; 10:100. PMC: 3491053. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-100. View

3.
Thorpe O, Johnston K, Kumar S . Barriers and enablers to physical activity participation in patients with COPD: a systematic review. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012; 32(6):359-69. DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318262d7df. View

4.
Bestall J, Paul E, Garrod R, Garnham R, Jones P, Wedzicha J . Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 1999; 54(7):581-6. PMC: 1745516. DOI: 10.1136/thx.54.7.581. View

5.
Salawu A, Green A, Crooks M, Brixey N, Ross D, Sivan M . A Proposal for Multidisciplinary Tele-Rehabilitation in the Assessment and Rehabilitation of COVID-19 Survivors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(13). PMC: 7369849. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17134890. View