» Articles » PMID: 36911521

Muscular and Cortical Activation During Dynamic and Static Balance in the Elderly: A Scoping Review

Overview
Journal Aging Brain
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2023 Mar 13
PMID 36911521
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Falls due to balance impairment are a major cause of injury and disability in the elderly. The study of neurophysiological correlates during static and dynamic balance tasks is an emerging area of research that could lead to novel rehabilitation strategies and reduce fall risk. This review aims to highlight key concepts and identify gaps in the current knowledge of balance control in the elderly that could be addressed by relying on surface electromyographic (EMG) and electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings. The neurophysiological hypotheses underlying balance studies in the elderly as well as the methodologies, findings, and limitations of prior work are herein addressed. The literature shows: 1) a wide heterogeneity in the experimental procedures, protocols, and analyses; 2) a paucity of studies involving the investigation of cortical activity; 3) aging-related alterations of cortical activation during balance tasks characterized by lower cortico-muscular coherence and increased allocation of attentional control to postural tasks in the elderly; and 4) EMG patterns characterized by delayed onset after perturbations, increased levels of activity, and greater levels of muscle co-activation in the elderly compared to younger adults. EMG and EEG recordings are valuable tools to monitor muscular and cortical activity during the performance of balance tasks. However, standardized protocols and analysis techniques should be agreed upon and shared by the scientific community to provide reliable and reproducible results. This will allow researchers to gain a comprehensive knowledge on the neurophysiological changes affecting static and dynamic balance in the elderly and will inform the design of rehabilitative and preventive interventions.

Citing Articles

Research on Brain Networks of Human Balance Based on Phase Estimation Synchronization.

Qiu Y, Luo Z Brain Sci. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38790427 PMC: 11118820. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14050448.


Neurophysiological, balance and motion evidence in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review.

Paramento M, Passarotto E, Maccarone M, Agostini M, Contessa P, Rubega M PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303086.

PMID: 38776317 PMC: 11111046. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303086.


Non-invasive brain imaging to advance the understanding of human balance.

Huang H, Ferris D Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2024; 28.

PMID: 38250696 PMC: 10795750. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobme.2023.100505.


Muscular and Kinematic Responses to Unexpected Translational Balance Perturbation: A Pilot Study in Healthy Young Adults.

Tong C, Zhu R, Ling Y, Scheeren E, Lam F, Fu H Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(7).

PMID: 37508858 PMC: 10376184. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10070831.


Risk of Single and Multiple Injuries Due to Static Balance and Movement Quality in Physically Active Women.

Kozlenia D, Domaradzki J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(19).

PMID: 36231497 PMC: 9564762. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912197.


References
1.
Li L, Baum B . Electromechanical delay estimated by using electromyography during cycling at different pedaling frequencies. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004; 14(6):647-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.04.004. View

2.
Maurer C, Mergner T, Peterka R . Multisensory control of human upright stance. Exp Brain Res. 2005; 171(2):231-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0256-y. View

3.
Baudry S, Lecoeuvre G, Duchateau J . Age-related changes in the behavior of the muscle-tendon unit of the gastrocnemius medialis during upright stance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011; 112(2):296-304. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00913.2011. View

4.
Hallal C, Marques N, Spinoso D, Vieira E, Goncalves M . Electromyographic patterns of lower limb muscles during apprehensive gait in younger and older female adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013; 23(5):1145-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.06.006. View

5.
Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E . Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18(1):143. PMC: 6245623. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. View