» Articles » PMID: 36911042

Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab As a Second Line Biologic After Tocilizumab Treatment Failure in Children with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Single-centre Cohort Study Using Routinely Collected Health Data

Abstract

Background: A significant number of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) patients discontinue biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) due to lack of efficacy or safety concerns. Studies of biologic therapy switch regimens in sJIA are required.

Methods: Patients with sJIA who switched from tocilizumab (due to lack of efficacy or safety) to canakinumab (4 mg/kg every 4 weeks) and were hospitalized at the rheumatology department from August 2012 to July 2020 were included. Primary efficacy outcomes were 30% or greater improvement based on the paediatric criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR30), achievement of inactive disease (JADAS-71 = 0) and clinical remission (ACR sJIA clinical inactive disease criteria). Follow-up from time first canakinumab dose administered was 12 months or the closest time point (not less than 6 and not more than 18 months). Data were extracted from electronic outpatient medical records.

Results: During the study period, 46 patients with sJIA switched from tocilizumab to canakinumab. Median age at baseline was 8.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 4.0-12.9] years, with the median sJIA duration being 1.8 (IQR 0.8-5.8) years; 37 (80%) patients received at least one conventional DMARD (cDMARD; oral corticosteroids, methotrexate and/or cyclosporine A). Study outcomes were followed up in 45 patients (one patient did not attend the follow-up for an unknown reason); median follow-up was 359 (IQR 282-404) days. During the follow-up, 1 patient discontinued canakinumab due to tuberculosis detection and the dose was reduced or the injection interval increased in 4 (9%) patients. In total, 27 (60%) patients continued to receive at least one cDMARD. Improvement according to the ACR30 criteria was achieved in 43 patients [96%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 85-99], inactive disease in 42 (93%; 95%CI 82-98), and remission in 37 (82%; 95% CI 69-91); after adjustment for actual time-at-risk, the rates were 83, 85 and 73 events per 100 person-years, respectively. During follow-up, 23 AEs (most frequently infections) were reported in 19/45 (42%) patients; 5/45 (11%) patients developed macrophage activation syndrome, with a favorable outcome in all cases.

Conclusions: One-year canakinumab therapy was found to be potentially effective as second-line biologic therapy after discontinuation of tocilizumab in patients with sJIA.

Citing Articles

Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part II: Risk of Infections. A Narrative Review.

Mansilla-Polo M, Morgado-Carrasco D Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024; 14(8):1983-2038.

PMID: 39014279 PMC: 11333430. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01203-2.


Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part I: Cancer Risk. A Narrative Review.

Mansilla-Polo M, Morgado-Carrasco D Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024; 14(6):1389-1442.

PMID: 38763966 PMC: 11169156. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01166-4.


Canakinumab in the treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a retrospective single center study in China.

Zhu X, Weng R, Huang Y, Xu Y, Yang J, He T Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1349907.

PMID: 38550627 PMC: 10973106. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1349907.


Recent advances and evolving concepts in Still's disease.

Ruscitti P, Cantarini L, Nigrovic P, McGonagle D, Giacomelli R Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2024; 20(2):116-132.

PMID: 38212542 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-023-01065-6.


Efficacy of canakinumab in patients with Still's disease across different lines of biologic therapy: real-life data from the International AIDA Network Registry for Still's Disease.

Vitale A, Caggiano V, Sfikakis P, Dagna L, Lopalco G, Ragab G Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1256243.

PMID: 38148914 PMC: 10749954. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1256243.


References
1.
Suematsu S, Matsuda T, Aozasa K, Akira S, Nakano N, Ohno S . IgG1 plasmacytosis in interleukin 6 transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989; 86(19):7547-51. PMC: 298102. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.19.7547. View

2.
Gattorno M, Piccini A, Lasiglie D, Tassi S, Brisca G, Carta S . The pattern of response to anti-interleukin-1 treatment distinguishes two subsets of patients with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58(5):1505-15. DOI: 10.1002/art.23437. View

3.
De Benedetti F, Rucci N, Del Fattore A, Peruzzi B, Paro R, Longo M . Impaired skeletal development in interleukin-6-transgenic mice: a model for the impact of chronic inflammation on the growing skeletal system. Arthritis Rheum. 2006; 54(11):3551-63. DOI: 10.1002/art.22175. View

4.
Schulert G, Minoia F, Bohnsack J, Cron R, Hashad S, Kone-Paut I . Effect of Biologic Therapy on Clinical and Laboratory Features of Macrophage Activation Syndrome Associated With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017; 70(3):409-419. DOI: 10.1002/acr.23277. View

5.
Grom A, Ilowite N, Pascual V, Brunner H, Martini A, Lovell D . Rate and Clinical Presentation of Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treated With Canakinumab. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 68(1):218-28. DOI: 10.1002/art.39407. View