» Articles » PMID: 36910725

Decreasing Time Intervals in Recurring Capsular Contracture? A Single Center Retrospective Study over 6 Years

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Mar 13
PMID 36910725
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methods: In the period from 2012 to 2017, all patients with breast implant replacements or removals at our institution were identified. From the medical file, the time of the first implantation and earlier replacements were analyzed for indication and timing of surgery.

Results: A total of 498 operations for implant replacement or removal were analyzed in 323 patients. Including prior operations, 717 procedures could be evaluated. If capsular contracture was the indication, revision surgery was performed on average 14.3 years or 8.4 years in aesthetic or reconstructive cases, respectively. In patients with more than one implant removal or replacement, we saw a reduction in the time interval between the first, second, and third follow-up operation.

Conclusions: The main indication to perform implant replacements or removals was capsular contracture recurring at increasingly shorter intervals. Patients must be informed about this possible progression when changing implants, but also before the first operation. If capsular contracture occurs after a rather short time period in reconstructive cases, the opportunity of an alternative approach (eg, autologous reconstruction) instead of a renewed implant change should be discussed with the patient.

Citing Articles

Breast Implants: Low Rate of Annual Check-Ups Results in Delayed Presentation of Ruptured Implants.

Flores T, Kerschbaumer C, Glisic C, Weber M, Schrogendorfer K, Bergmeister K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518683 PMC: 11547161. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216545.


Erratum: Decreasing Time Intervals in Recurring Capsular Contracture? A Single Center Retrospective Study over 6 Years: Erratum.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023; 11(6):e5111.

PMID: 37377526 PMC: 10292732. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005111.

References
1.
Spear S, Murphy D . Natrelle round silicone breast implants: Core Study results at 10 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133(6):1354-1361. PMC: 4819531. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000021. View

2.
Ascherman J, Hanasono M, Newman M, Hughes D . Implant reconstruction in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117(2):359-65. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000201478.64877.87. View

3.
Jhaveri J, Rush S, Kostroff K, Derisi D, Farber L, Maurer V . Clinical outcomes of postmastectomy radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 72(3):859-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.055. View

4.
Stevens W, Nahabedian M, Calobrace M, Harrington J, Capizzi P, Cohen R . Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 5-year Sientra study analysis using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132(5):1115-1123. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000435317.76381.68. View

5.
Seigle-Murandi F, Lefebvre F, Bruant-Rodier C, Bodin F . Incidence of breast implant rupture in a 12-year retrospective cohort: Evidence of quality discrepancy depending on the range. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016; 70(1):42-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.11.001. View