» Articles » PMID: 36900910

Health Psychology Services for People in Disadvantaged Regions of Hungary: Experiences from the Primary Health Care Development Model Program

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Mar 11
PMID 36900910
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The importance of community health psychology in providing complex bio-psycho-social care is well documented. We present a mixed-method outcome-monitoring study of health psychology services in the public-health-focused Primary Health Care Development Model Program (2012-2017) in four disadvantaged micro-regions in northeast Hungary.

Methods: Study 1 assessed the availability of the services using a sample of 17,003 respondents. Study 2 applied a follow-up design to measure the mental health outcomes of the health psychology services on a sample of 132 clients. In Study 3, we conducted focus-group interviews to assess clients' lived experiences.

Results: More mental health issues and higher education predicted a higher probability of service use. Follow-up showed that individual and group-based psychological interventions resulted in less depression and (marginally) higher well-being. Thematic analysis of the focus-group interviews indicated that participants deemed topics such as psychoeducation, greater acceptance of psychological support, and heightened awareness of individual and community support important.

Conclusions: The results of the monitoring study demonstrate the important role health psychology services can play in primary healthcare in disadvantaged regions in Hungary. Community health psychology can improve well-being, reduce inequality, raise the population's health awareness, and address unmet social needs in disadvantaged regions.

References
1.
Nafradi L, Nakamoto K, Schulz P . Is patient empowerment the key to promote adherence? A systematic review of the relationship between self-efficacy, health locus of control and medication adherence. PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0186458. PMC: 5645121. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186458. View

2.
Parslow R, Jorm A . Who uses mental health services in Australia? An analysis of data from the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2000; 34(6):997-1008. DOI: 10.1080/000486700276. View

3.
Macinko J, Starfield B, Shi L . The contribution of primary care systems to health outcomes within Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, 1970-1998. Health Serv Res. 2003; 38(3):831-65. PMC: 1360919. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.00149. View

4.
Cape J, Whittington C, Buszewicz M, Wallace P, Underwood L . Brief psychological therapies for anxiety and depression in primary care: meta-analysis and meta-regression. BMC Med. 2010; 8:38. PMC: 2908553. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-38. View

5.
Roe D, Mazor Y, Gelkopf M . Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and provider assessment in mental health: a systematic review of the context of implementation. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019; 34(Suppl 1):ii28–ii39. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz084. View