» Articles » PMID: 36900851

A Bibliometric Analysis to Identify Research Trends in Intervention Programs for Smartphone Addiction

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Mar 11
PMID 36900851
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Smartphone addiction is a serious social problem that necessitates research. To identify trends in intervention programs for smartphone addiction, distribution of research topics, and inter-relationships in academic research. We analyzed 104 studies published between 30 June 2022, and 31 August 2022, on the Web of Science (WoS). We applied the bibliometric method and identified the relationship and development trends of academic research in the field using descriptive analysis, the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and co-occurrence. There were four findings: First, intervention programs are classified into 10 types: psychological, social support, lifestyle, technological, family, medical care, educational, exercise, mindfulness, and meditation. Second, the volume of research on intervention programs increased every year. Third, China and South Korea had the highest research involvement. Finally, academic studies were split into either the human behavior or social science categories. Most of them defined the symptoms in terms of individual behavior and social relations, implying that smartphone addiction is not yet recognized as a disorder. Smartphone addiction has not yet been internationally recognized as a disorder, despite its impact on human physiology, psychology, and social behavior. Most related studies have been conducted in Asia, specifically in China and South Korea; Spain has the most outside Asia. Additionally, most of the research subjects were students, probably because of the convenience of sampling. As smartphones gain popularity among older adults, future studies could focus on smartphone addiction among individuals of varied ages.

Citing Articles

Prevalence, associated factors and consequence of problematic smartphone use among adolescents and young adults in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study.

Islam M, Mondol A, Kundu R, Baroi J, Akter S, Urmi T PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0308621.

PMID: 39186514 PMC: 11346645. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308621.


Association between impulsivity and cognitive capacity decrease is mediated by smartphone addiction, academic procrastination, bedtime procrastination, sleep insufficiency and daytime fatigue among medical students: a path analysis.

Hamvai C, Kiss H, Voros H, Fitzpatrick K, Vargha A, Piko B BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):537.

PMID: 37501113 PMC: 10375684. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04522-8.

References
1.
Arpaci I, Kocadag Unver T . Moderating Role of Gender in the Relationship between Big Five Personality Traits and Smartphone Addiction. Psychiatr Q. 2020; 91(2):577-585. DOI: 10.1007/s11126-020-09718-5. View

2.
Lai X, Huang S, Nie C, Yan J, Li Y, Wang Y . Trajectory of problematic smartphone use among adolescents aged 10-18 years: The roles of childhood family environment and concurrent parent-child relationships. J Behav Addict. 2022; 11(2):577-587. PMC: 9295210. DOI: 10.1556/2006.2022.00047. View

3.
Lee J, Ahn J, Min S, Kim M . Psychological Characteristics and Addiction Propensity According to Content Type of Smartphone Use. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(7). PMC: 7177936. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072292. View

4.
Lapierre M, Zhao P, Custer B . Short-Term Longitudinal Relationships Between Smartphone Use/Dependency and Psychological Well-Being Among Late Adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2019; 65(5):607-612. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.06.001. View

5.
Saadeh H, Al Fayez R, Al Refaei A, Shewaikani N, Khawaldah H, Abu-Shanab S . Smartphone Use Among University Students During COVID-19 Quarantine: An Ethical Trigger. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:600134. PMC: 8350027. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.600134. View