» Articles » PMID: 36897799

No Significant Salt or Sweet Taste Preference or Sensitivity Differences Following Ad Libitum Consumption of Ultra-processed and Unprocessed Diets: a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Abstract

Ultra-processed food consumption has increased worldwide, yet little is known about the potential links with taste preference and sensitivity. This exploratory study aimed to (i) compare sweet and salty taste detection thresholds and preferences following consumption of ultra-processed and unprocessed diets, (ii) investigate whether sweet and salty taste sensitivity and preference were associated with taste substrates (i.e. sodium and sugar) and ad libitum nutrient intake, and (iii) examine associations of taste detection thresholds and preferences with blood pressure (BP) and anthropometric measures following consumption of ultra-processed and unprocessed diets. In a randomized crossover study, participants (N = 20) received ultra-processed or unprocessed foods for 2 weeks, followed by the alternate diet. Baseline food intake data were collected prior to admission. Taste detection thresholds and preferences were measured at the end of each diet arm. Taste-substrate/nutrient intake, body mass index (BMI), and body weight (BW) were measured daily. No significant differences were observed in participant salt and sweet detection thresholds or preferences after 2 weeks on ultra-processed or unprocessed diets. There was no significant association between salt and sweet taste detection thresholds, preferences, and nutrient intakes on either diet arm. A positive correlation was observed between salt taste preference and systolic BP (r = 0.59; P = 0.01), BW (r = 0.47, P = 0.04), and BMI (r = 0.50; P = 0.03) following consumption of the ultra-processed diet. Thus, a 2-week consumption of an ultra-processed diet does not appear to acutely impact sweet or salty taste sensitivity or preference. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03407053.

Citing Articles

Ultra-processed Food and Obesity: What Is the Evidence?.

Dicken S, Batterham R Curr Nutr Rep. 2024; 13(1):23-38.

PMID: 38294671 PMC: 10924027. DOI: 10.1007/s13668-024-00517-z.


Pertinence of Salt-Related Knowledge and Reported Behaviour on Salt Intake in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Marakis G, Marques Domingues A, Crispo A, Magriplis E, Vasara E, Kontopoulou L Nutrients. 2023; 15(19).

PMID: 37836397 PMC: 10574173. DOI: 10.3390/nu15194114.


Impact on Fecal Microbiota and Health-Related Markers of an Intervention Focused on Improving Eating Behavior in People at Risk of Food Insecurity.

Zapico A, Arboleya S, Salazar N, Perillan C, Ruiz-Saavedra S, de Los Reyes-Gavilan C Nutrients. 2023; 15(16).

PMID: 37630728 PMC: 10459582. DOI: 10.3390/nu15163537.


Ultraprocessed Foods and Obesity Risk: A Critical Review of Reported Mechanisms.

Valicente V, Peng C, Pacheco K, Lin L, Kielb E, Dawoodani E Adv Nutr. 2023; 14(4):718-738.

PMID: 37080461 PMC: 10334162. DOI: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.04.006.

References
1.
Joseph P, Mennella J, Cowart B, Pepino M . Psychophysical Tracking Method to Assess Taste Detection Thresholds in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: The Taste Detection Threshold (TDT) Test. J Vis Exp. 2021; (170). PMC: 8560331. DOI: 10.3791/62384. View

2.
Canhada S, Luft V, Giatti L, Duncan B, Chor D, Fonseca M . Ultra-processed foods, incident overweight and obesity, and longitudinal changes in weight and waist circumference: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Public Health Nutr. 2019; 23(6):1076-1086. PMC: 7282862. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980019002854. View

3.
Iatridi V, Hayes J, Yeomans M . Quantifying Sweet Taste Liker Phenotypes: Time for Some Consistency in the Classification Criteria. Nutrients. 2019; 11(1). PMC: 6357166. DOI: 10.3390/nu11010129. View

4.
Gibney M . Ultra-Processed Foods: Definitions and Policy Issues. Curr Dev Nutr. 2019; 3(2):nzy077. PMC: 6389637. DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzy077. View

5.
Garneau N, Nuessle T, Mendelsberg B, Shepard S, Tucker R . Sweet liker status in children and adults: Consequences for beverage intake in adults. Food Qual Prefer. 2019; 65:175-180. PMC: 6638566. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.005. View