Development and Validation of the Attribution of Mental States Questionnaire (AMS-Q): A Reference Tool for Assessing Anthropomorphism

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2023 Mar 10

PMID 36895742

Authors

Laura Miraglia

Giulia Peretti

Federico Manzi

Cinzia Di Dio

Davide Massaro

Antonella Marchetti

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Attributing mental states to others, such as feelings, beliefs, goals, desires, and attitudes, is an important interpersonal ability, necessary for adaptive relationships, which underlies the ability to mentalize. To evaluate the attribution of mental and sensory states, a new 23-item measure, the Attribution of Mental States Questionnaire (AMS-Q), has been developed. The present study aimed to investigate the dimensionality of the AMS-Q and its psychometric proprieties in two studies. Study 1 focused on the development of the questionnaire and its factorial structure in a sample of Italian adults ( = 378). Study 2 aimed to confirm the findings in a new sample ( = 271). Besides the AMS-Q, Study 2 included assessments of Theory of Mind (ToM), mentalization, and alexithymia. A Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and a Parallel Analysis (PA) of the data from Study 1 yielded three factors assessing mental states with positive or neutral valence (AMS-NP), mental states with negative valence (AMS-N), and sensory states (AMS-S). These showed satisfactory reliability indexes. AMS-Q's whole-scale internal consistency was excellent. Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) further confirmed the three-factor structure. The AMS-Q subscales also showed a consistent pattern of correlation with associated constructs in the theoretically predicted ways, relating positively to ToM and mentalization and negatively to alexithymia. Thus, the questionnaire is considered suitable to be easily administered and sensitive for assessing the attribution of mental and sensory states to humans. The AMS-Q can also be administered with stimuli of nonhuman agents (e.g., animals, inanimate things, and even God); this allows the level of mental anthropomorphization of other agents to be assessed using the human as a term of comparison, providing important hints in the perception of nonhuman entities as more or less mentalistic compared to human beings, and identifying what factors are required for the attribution of human mental traits to nonhuman agents, further helping to delineate the perception of others' minds.

References

Wimmer H, Perner J . Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition. 1983; 13(1):103-28. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5. View

Kteily N, Hodson G, Bruneau E . They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016; 110(3):343-70. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000044. View

Bellagamba F, Laghi F, Lonigro A, Pace C . Re-enactment of intended acts from a video presentation by 18- and 24-month-old children. Cogn Process. 2012; 13(4):381-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-012-0518-0. View

Frith C, Frith U . The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron. 2006; 50(4):531-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001. View

Gray H, Gray K, Wegner D . Dimensions of mind perception. Science. 2007; 315(5812):619. DOI: 10.1126/science.1134475. View

Goldstein N, Vezich I, Shapiro J . Perceived perspective taking: when others walk in our shoes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014; 106(6):941-60. DOI: 10.1037/a0036395. View

Meins E, Fernyhough C, De Rosnay M, Arnott B, Leekam S, Turner M . Mind-Mindedness as a Multidimensional Construct: Appropriate and Nonattuned Mind-Related Comments Independently Predict Infant-Mother Attachment in a Socially Diverse Sample. Infancy. 2020; 17(4):393-415. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00087.x. View

Krach S, Hegel F, Wrede B, Sagerer G, Binkofski F, Kircher T . Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI. PLoS One. 2008; 3(7):e2597. PMC: 2440351. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002597. View

Frith C, Frith U . Interacting minds--a biological basis. Science. 1999; 286(5445):1692-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5445.1692. View

10.

Gray K, Wegner D . Feeling robots and human zombies: mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition. 2012; 125(1):125-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007. View

11.

Meins E, Fernyhough C, Wainwright R, Das Gupta M, Fradley E, Tuckey M . Maternal mind-mindedness and attachment security as predictors of theory of mind understanding. Child Dev. 2002; 73(6):1715-26. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00501. View

12.

McEwen F, Happe F, Bolton P, Rijsdijk F, Ronald A, Dworzynski K . Origins of individual differences in imitation: links with language, pretend play, and socially insightful behavior in two-year-old twins. Child Dev. 2007; 78(2):474-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01010.x. View

13.

Giovanelli C, Di Dio C, Lombardi E, Tagini A, Meins E, Marchetti A . Exploring the relation between maternal mind-mindedness and children's symbolic play: A longitudinal study from 6 to 18 months. Infancy. 2020; 25(1):67-83. DOI: 10.1111/infa.12317. View

14.

Manzi F, Sorgente A, Massaro D, Villani D, Di Lernia D, Malighetti C . Emerging Adults' Expectations About the Next Generation of Robots: Exploring Robotic Needs Through a Latent Profile Analysis. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021; 24(5):315-323. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0161. View

15.

Bentler P . Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107(2):238-46. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238. View

16.

Zwick W, Velicer W . Factors Influencing Four Rules For Determining The Number Of Components To Retain. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 17(2):253-69. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1702_5. View

17.

Gray K, Jenkins A, Heberlein A, Wegner D . Distortions of mind perception in psychopathology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 108(2):477-9. PMC: 3021012. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1015493108. View

18.

Mull M, Evans E . Did she mean to do it? Acquiring a folk theory of intentionality. J Exp Child Psychol. 2010; 107(3):207-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.001. View

19.

Fonagy P, Luyten P . A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Dev Psychopathol. 2009; 21(4):1355-81. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579409990198. View

20.

Manzi F, Di Dio C, Di Lernia D, Rossignoli D, Maggioni M, Massaro D . Can You Activate Me? From Robots to Human Brain. Front Robot AI. 2021; 8:633514. PMC: 7933445. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.633514. View