» Articles » PMID: 36895603

Hemiarthroplasty Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Intra-articular Distal Humerus Fractures in Older Patients

Overview
Journal Shoulder Elbow
Date 2023 Mar 10
PMID 36895603
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Intra-articular distal humerus fractures in the older population remain a challenge to fix, due to the comminution of fragments and poor bone stock. Recently Elbow Hemiarthroplasty (EHA) has gained popularity to treat these fractures, however no studies exist comparing EHA to Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF).

Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients over the age of 60 years treated with ORIF or EHA for multi-fragmentary distal humerus fractures.

Methods: Thirty-six patients (mean age 73 years) treated surgically for a multi-fragmentary intra-articular distal humeral fracture were followed up for a mean duration of thirty-four months (12-73 months). Eighteen patients were treated with ORIF and eighteen with EHA. The groups were matched for fracture type, demographic characteristics and follow up time. Outcome measures collected included Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Visual Analogue pain Score (VAS), range of motion (ROM), complications, re-operations and radiographic outcomes. The quality of ORIF was judged against set radiographic criteria in order to understand the effect of sub-optimal ORIF technique.

Results: No significant clinical difference was found between EHA and ORIF in mean OES (42.5 vs 39.6,  = 0.28), mean VAS (0.5 vs 1.7,   0.08) or mean flexion-extension arc (123° vs 112°,   0.12). There were significantly more complications associated with ORIF compared to EHA (39% vs 6%,  = 0.04). ORIF executed with satisfactory fixation technique had a comparable complication rate compared to EHA (17% vs 6%,  = 0.6). Two ORIF patients required revision to Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA). None of the EHA patients required revision surgery.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated similar short-term functional outcomes between EHA and ORIF for the treatment of multi-fragmentary intra-articular distal humeral fractures in patients >60 years of age. Early complications and re-operations were higher in the ORIF group, although this could be related to improper ORIF technique and patient selection.

Citing Articles

The age specific performance of elbow hemiarthroplasty: A systematic review.

Heifner J, Falgiano P, Yergler T, Davis T, Hoekzema N, Orbay J Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241246756.

PMID: 39552692 PMC: 11562450. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241246756.

References
1.
Phadnis J, Watts A, Bain G . Elbow hemiarthroplasty for the management of distal humeral fractures: current technique, indications and results. Shoulder Elbow. 2016; 8(3):171-83. PMC: 4950283. DOI: 10.1177/1758573216640210. View

2.
Patino J . Complex distal humerus fractures in elderly patients: open reduction and internal fixation versus arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37(8):1699-701. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.11.020. View

3.
Phadnis J, Banerjee S, Watts A, Little N, Hearnden A, Patel V . Elbow hemiarthroplasty using a "triceps-on" approach for the management of acute distal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24(8):1178-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.010. View

4.
Watson J, Bellringer S, Phadnis J . Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus: Current concepts and surgical techniques. Shoulder Elbow. 2020; 12(2):124-135. PMC: 7153208. DOI: 10.1177/1758573219826529. View

5.
Mehlhoff T, Bennett J . Distal humeral fractures: fixation versus arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(2 Suppl):S97-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.012. View