» Articles » PMID: 36895482

Efficacy and Safety of Different Radiotherapy Doses in Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Mar 10
PMID 36895482
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with different radiotherapy doses (45Gy and 50.4Gy) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods: Herein, 120 patients with LARC were retrospectively enrolled between January 2016 and June 2021. All patients underwent two courses of induction chemotherapy (XELOX), chemoradiotherapy, and total mesorectum excision (TME). A total of 72 patients received a radiotherapy dose of 50.4 Gy, while 48 patients received a dose of 45 Gy. Surgery was then performed within 5-12 weeks following nCRT.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the baseline characteristics of the two groups. The rate of good pathological response in the 50.4Gy group was 59.72% (43/72), while in the 45Gy group achieved 64.58% (31/48) (P>0.05). The disease control rate (DCR) in the 50.4Gy group was 88.89% (64/72), compared to 89.58% (43/48) in the 45Gy group (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions for radioactive proctitis, myelosuppression, and intestinal obstruction or perforation differed significantly between the two groups (P<0.05). The anal retention rate in the 50.4Gy group was significantly higher in contrast to the 45Gy group (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Patients receiving a radiotherapy dose of 50.4Gy have a better anal retention rate but also a higher incidence of adverse events such as radioactive proctitis, myelosuppression, and intestinal obstruction or perforation, and a comparable prognosis to patients treated with a radiotherapy dose of 45Gy.

Citing Articles

Short- and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Guo Y, Guo Z, Zhang J, Qian G, Ji W, Song L BMC Gastroenterol. 2025; 25(1):87.

PMID: 39962374 PMC: 11834637. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-025-03667-8.

References
1.
Zheng Z, Wang X, Lu X, Huang Y, Chi P . Prognostic significance of carcinoembryonic antigen combined with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23(9):2320-2330. DOI: 10.1111/codi.15694. View

2.
Hofheinz R, Wenz F, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann J . Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(6):579-88. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70116-X. View

3.
Dekker E, Tanis P, Vleugels J, Kasi P, Wallace M . Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2019; 394(10207):1467-1480. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0. View

4.
Garcia-Aguilar J, Patil S, Gollub M, Kim J, Yuval J, Thompson H . Organ Preservation in Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma Treated With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40(23):2546-2556. PMC: 9362876. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00032. View

5.
Cercek A, Goodman K, Hajj C, Weisberger E, Segal N, Reidy-Lagunes D . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy first, followed by chemoradiation and then surgery, in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014; 12(4):513-9. PMC: 5612781. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0056. View