» Articles » PMID: 36892729

Impact of Body Mass Index on PROMIS Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression

Overview
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2023 Mar 9
PMID 36892729
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: No studies have examined the impact of body mass index (BMI) on newer Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar decompression (LD).

Methods: Patients undergoing LD with preoperative PROMIS measures were stratified into four cohorts: normal (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m), obese I (30 ≤ BMI < 35 kg/m), and obese II-III (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m). Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were obtained. PROs of PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), PROMIS Anxiety (PROMIS-A), PROMIS Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), PROMIS Sleep Disturbance (PROMIS-SD), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back Pain (VAS-BP), VAS Leg Pain (VAS-LP), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected at preoperative and up to 2-year postoperative time points. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was determined through comparison of previously established values. Comparison between cohorts were determined through inferential statistics.

Results: A total of 473 patients were identified, with stratification of 125 patients in the normal cohort, 161 in the overweight cohort, 101 in the obese I cohort, and 87 in the obese II-III cohort. Mean postoperative follow-up time was 13.51 ± 8.72 months. Higher BMI patients had higher operative times, longer postoperative length of stay, and greater narcotic consumption (p ≤ 0.001, all). Patients with higher BMI (obese I, obese II-III) reported inferior preoperative PROMIS-PF, VAS-BP, and ODI scores (p ≤ 0.003, all). Postoperatively, obese I-III cohorts demonstrated inferior PROMIS-PF, PHQ-9, VAS-BP, and ODI scores at final follow-up (p ≤ 0.016, all). However, patients demonstrated similar postoperative changes and MCID achievement regardless of preoperative BMI.

Conclusion: Patients undergoing lumbar decompression demonstrated similar postoperative improvement in physical function, anxiety, pain interference, sleep disturbance, mental health, pain, and disability outcomes independent of preoperative BMI. However, obese patients reported worse physical function, mental health, back pain, and disability outcomes at final postoperative follow-up. Patients with greater BMI undergoing lumbar decompression demonstrate inferior postoperative clinical outcomes.

Citing Articles

Disability and pain after lumbar surgery-group-based trajectory analysis.

Koivunen K, Arokoski J, Widbom-Kolhanen S, Pernaa K, Juhola J, Saltychev M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0313528.

PMID: 39787104 PMC: 11717237. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313528.


Letter: "Impact of body mass index on PROMIS outcomes following lumbar decompression".

Ozden F Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023; 165(12):3959-3960.

PMID: 37721565 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05804-2.

References
1.
Amtmann D, Cook K, Jensen M, Chen W, Choi S, Revicki D . Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain. 2010; 150(1):173-182. PMC: 2916053. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025. View

2.
Belcaid I, Eipe N . Perioperative Pain Management in Morbid Obesity. Drugs. 2019; 79(11):1163-1175. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-019-01156-3. View

3.
Chen C, Kroenke K, Stump T, Kean J, Carpenter J, Krebs E . Estimating minimally important differences for the PROMIS pain interference scales: results from 3 randomized clinical trials. Pain. 2017; 159(4):775-782. PMC: 5860950. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001121. View

4.
Chiolero A, Faeh D, Paccaud F, Cornuz J . Consequences of smoking for body weight, body fat distribution, and insulin resistance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008; 87(4):801-9. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/87.4.801. View

5.
Chou L, Brady S, Urquhart D, Teichtahl A, Cicuttini F, Pasco J . The Association Between Obesity and Low Back Pain and Disability Is Affected by Mood Disorders: A Population-Based, Cross-Sectional Study of Men. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(15):e3367. PMC: 4839843. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003367. View