» Articles » PMID: 36892719

MRI Image Features with an Evident Relation to Low Back Pain: a Narrative Review

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Mar 9
PMID 36892719
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent health condition worldwide and responsible for the most years lived with disability, yet the etiology is often unknown. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used for treatment decision even though it is often inconclusive. There are many different image features that could relate to low back pain. Conversely, multiple etiologies do relate to spinal degeneration but do not actually cause the perceived pain. This narrative review provides an overview of all possible relevant features visible on MRI images and determines their relation to LBP.

Methods: We conducted a separate literature search per image feature. All included studies were scored using the GRADE guidelines. Based on the reported results per feature an evidence agreement (EA) score was provided, enabling us to compare the collected evidence of separate image features. The various relations between MRI features and their associated pain mechanisms were evaluated to provide a list of features that are related to LBP.

Results: All searches combined generated a total of 4472 hits of which 31 articles were included. Features were divided into five different categories:'discogenic', 'neuropathic','osseous', 'facetogenic', and'paraspinal', and discussed separately.

Conclusion: Our research suggests that type I Modic changes, disc degeneration, endplate defects, disc herniation, spinal canal stenosis, nerve compression, and muscle fat infiltration have the highest probability to be related to LBP. These can be used to improve clinical decision-making for patients with LBP based on MRI.

Citing Articles

Multivariable Analysis of the Association Between Lumbar and Lumbosacral MRI-Diagnosed Spinal Pathologies and Pain in Dogs.

Medina-Serra R, Lopez-Abradelo P, Belda E, Riding-Medina H, Laredo F, Marwood R Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40076044 PMC: 11898813. DOI: 10.3390/ani15050761.


Quantitative evaluation of risk factors for low back pain in young patients using synthetic magnetic resonance imaging and proton density fat fraction analyses.

Yang Y, Lin W, Wen H, Luo X, Zhou X, Zou F Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2024; 15:20406223241293260.

PMID: 39493004 PMC: 11528588. DOI: 10.1177/20406223241293260.


AI-based lumbar central canal stenosis classification on sagittal MR images is comparable to experienced radiologists using axial images.

van der Graaf J, Brundel L, van Hooff M, de Kleuver M, Lessmann N, Maresch B Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39299953 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11080-0.


Association between MRI measurements of lumbar spine alterations and self-reported outcomes of pain and disability in subjects with non-specific low back pain.

Bassani T, Colombini A, Pallotta L, Sconfienza L, Albano D, Brayda-Bruno M Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(12):4572-4580.

PMID: 39164509 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08449-6.


The importance of psoas muscle on low back pain: a single-center study on lumbar spine MRI.

Mallio C, Russo F, Vadala G, Papalia R, Pileri M, Mancuso V N Am Spine Soc J. 2024; 18:100326.

PMID: 38947493 PMC: 11214412. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100326.


References
1.
Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C . The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73(6):968-74. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. View

2.
Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J . Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(6):299. PMC: 7186678. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175. View

3.
Fatoye F, Gebrye T, Odeyemi I . Real-world incidence and prevalence of low back pain using routinely collected data. Rheumatol Int. 2019; 39(4):619-626. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-019-04273-0. View

4.
Picavet H, Schouten J . Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain. 2003; 102(1-2):167-78. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00372-x. View

5.
van Tulder M . Health technology assessment (HTA) increasingly important in spine research. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(7):999-1000. PMC: 3176700. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1885-4. View