Simulation-based Prediction of Bone Healing and Treatment Recommendations for Lower Leg Fractures: Effects of Motion, Weight-bearing and Fibular Mechanics

Overview

Journal Front Bioeng Biotechnol

Date 2023 Mar 9

PMID 36890916

Authors

Marcel Orth

Bergita Ganse

Annchristin Andres

Kerstin Wickert

Elke Warmerdam

Max Muller

Stefan Diebels

Michael Roland

Tim Pohlemann

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Despite recent experimental and clinical progress in the treatment of tibial and fibular fractures, in clinical practice rates of delayed bone healing and non-union remain high. The aim of this study was to simulate and compare different mechanical conditions after lower leg fractures to assess the effects of postoperative motion, weight-bearing restrictions and fibular mechanics on the strain distribution and the clinical course. Based on the computed tomography (CT) data set of a real clinical case with a distal diaphyseal tibial fracture, a proximal and a distal fibular fracture, finite element simulations were run. Early postoperative motion data, recorded an inertial measuring unit system and pressure insoles were recorded and processed to study strain. The simulations were used to compute interfragmentary strain and the von Mises stress distribution of the intramedullary nail for different treatments of the fibula, as well as several walking velocities (1.0 km/h; 1.5 km/h; 2.0 km/h) and levels of weight-bearing restriction. The simulation of the real treatment was compared to the clinical course. The results show that a high postoperative walking speed was associated with higher loads in the fracture zone. In addition, a larger number of areas in the fracture gap with forces that exceeded beneficial mechanical properties longer was observed. Moreover, the simulations showed that surgical treatment of the distal fibular fracture had an impact on the healing course, whereas the proximal fibular fracture barely mattered. Weight-bearing restrictions were beneficial in reducing excessive mechanical conditions, while it is known that it is difficult for patients to adhere to partial weight-bearing recommendations. In conclusion, it is likely that motion, weight bearing and fibular mechanics influence the biomechanical milieu in the fracture gap. Simulations may improve decisions on the choice and location of surgical implants, as well as give recommendations for loading in the postoperative course of the individual patient.

Citing Articles

Finite element analysis of the Fibula's contribution to lower extremity torsional stiffness.

Alito A, Vitali A, Bruschetta A, Mantineo E, Filardi V J Orthop. 2025; 61:114-121.

PMID: 40046171 PMC: 11882339. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.007.

A novel strain-based bone-fracture healing algorithm is able to predict a range of healing outcomes.

Morgan G, Low L, Ramasamy A, Masouros S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1477405.

PMID: 39493303 PMC: 11527658. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1477405.

Finite element simulations of smart fracture plates capable of cyclic shortening and lengthening: which stroke for which fracture?.

Roland M, Diebels S, Wickert K, Pohlemann T, Ganse B Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1420047.

PMID: 39108595 PMC: 11300273. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1420047.

Case Studies of a Simulation Workflow to Improve Bone Healing Assessment in Impending Non-Unions.

Maisenbacher T, Libicher S, Erne F, Menger M, Reumann M, Schindler Y J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999488 PMC: 11242056. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133922.

Delayed Union and Nonunion: Current Concepts, Prevention, and Correction: A Review.

Bowers K, Anderson D Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38927761 PMC: 11201148. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11060525.

References

Pogliacomi F, Schiavi P, Calderazzi F, Ceccarelli F, Vaienti E . When is indicated fibular fixation in extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia?. Acta Biomed. 2019; 89(4):558-563. PMC: 6502107. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v89i4.7775. View

Seebeck P, Thompson M, Parwani A, Taylor W, Schell H, Duda G . Gait evaluation: a tool to monitor bone healing?. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2005; 20(9):883-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.05.010. View

Braun B, Veith N, Rollmann M, Orth M, Fritz T, Herath S . Weight-bearing recommendations after operative fracture treatment-fact or fiction? Gait results with and feasibility of a dynamic, continuous pedobarography insole. Int Orthop. 2017; 41(8):1507-1512. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3481-7. View

Rittweger J, Ireland A, Luscher S, Nocciolino L, Pilot N, Pisani L . Fibula: The Forgotten Bone-May It Provide Some Insight On a Wider Scope for Bone Mechanostat Control?. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018; 16(6):775-778. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-018-0497-x. View

Trabelsi N, Yosibash Z, Milgrom C . Validation of subject-specific automated p-FE analysis of the proximal femur. J Biomech. 2009; 42(3):234-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.039. View

Morin P, Reindl R, Harvey E, Beckman L, Steffen T . Fibular fixation as an adjuvant to tibial intramedullary nailing in the treatment of combined distal third tibia and fibula fractures: a biomechanical investigation. Can J Surg. 2008; 51(1):45-50. PMC: 2386295. View

Edwards W, Schnitzer T, Troy K . Torsional stiffness and strength of the proximal tibia are better predicted by finite element models than DXA or QCT. J Biomech. 2013; 46(10):1655-62. PMC: 3676700. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.04.016. View

Claes L, Heigele C . Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. J Biomech. 1999; 32(3):255-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00153-5. View

Hvid I, Bentzen S, Linde F, Mosekilde L, Pongsoipetch B . X-ray quantitative computed tomography: the relations to physical properties of proximal tibial trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech. 1989; 22(8-9):837-44. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90067-5. View

10.

Wan B, Yoda N, Zheng K, Zhang Z, Wu C, Clark J . On interaction between fatigue of reconstruction plate and time-dependent bone remodeling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022; 136:105483. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105483. View

11.

Ganse B, Yang P, Gardlo J, Gauger P, Kriechbaumer A, Pape H . Partial weight bearing of the tibia. Injury. 2016; 47(8):1777-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.06.003. View

12.

Kroger I, Mussig J, Brand A, Patzold R, Wackerle H, Klopfer-Kramer I . Recovery of gait and function during the first six months after tibial shaft fractures. Gait Posture. 2021; 91:66-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.09.199. View

13.

Klein P, Schell H, Streitparth F, Heller M, Kassi J, Kandziora F . The initial phase of fracture healing is specifically sensitive to mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res. 2003; 21(4):662-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00259-0. View

14.

Zannoni C, Mantovani R, Viceconti M . Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. Med Eng Phys. 1999; 20(10):735-40. DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(98)00081-2. View

15.

Shefelbine S, Augat P, Claes L, Simon U . Trabecular bone fracture healing simulation with finite element analysis and fuzzy logic. J Biomech. 2005; 38(12):2440-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.019. View

16.

Claes L, Cunningham J . Monitoring the mechanical properties of healing bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(8):1964-71. PMC: 2706346. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0752-7. View

17.

Moazen M, Calder P, Koroma P, Wright J, Taylor S, Blunn G . An experimental evaluation of fracture movement in two alternative tibial fracture fixation models using a vibrating platform. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2019; 233(5):595-599. DOI: 10.1177/0954411919837304. View

18.

Cattaneo P, Dalstra M, Frich L . A three-dimensional finite element model from computed tomography data: a semi-automated method. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2001; 215(2):203-13. DOI: 10.1243/0954411011533760. View

19.

Lin J, Djohan R, Dobryansky M, Chou S, Hou W, Chen M . Assessment of donor-site morbidity using balance and gait tests after bilateral fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap transfer. Ann Plast Surg. 2009; 62(3):246-51. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31817e9d1a. View

20.

Rho J, Hobatho M, Ashman R . Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys. 1995; 17(5):347-55. DOI: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)97314-f. View