» Articles » PMID: 36884069

Different Monoclonal Antibodies and Immunosuppressants Administration in Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: a Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal J Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Mar 8
PMID 36884069
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A variety of novel monoclonal antibodies and immunosuppressant have been proved effective in treating Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD). This network meta-analysis compared and ranked the efficacy and tolerability of currently used monoclonal antibodies and immunosuppressive agents in NMOSD.

Methods: Electronic database including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies evaluating monoclonal antibodies and immunosuppressants in patients with NMOSD. The primary outcome measures were annualized relapse rate (ARR), relapse rate, the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and total adverse events (AEs).

Results: We identified 25 studies with 2919 patients in our meta-analysis. For the primary outcome, rituximab (RTX) (SUCRA: 0.02) ranked first in reduction ARR with a significant difference compared with azathioprine (AZA) (MD - 0.34, 95% CrI - 0.55 to - 0.12) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (MD -0.38, 95% CrI - 0.63 to - 0.14). Tocilizumab (SUCRA: 0.05) ranked first in relapse rate, which was superior to satralizumab (lnOR - 25.4, 95% CrI - 74.4 to - 2.49) and inebilizumab (lnOR - 24.86, 95% CrI - 73.75 to - 1.93). MMF (SUCRA: 0.27) had the fewest AEs followed by RTX (SUCRA: 0.35), both of which showed a significant difference compared with AZA and corticosteroids (MMF vs AZA: lnOR - 1.58, 95% CrI - 2.48 to - 0.68; MMF vs corticosteroids: lnOR - 1.34, 95% CrI - 2.3 to - 0.37) (RTX vs AZA: lnOR - 1.34, 95% CrI - 0.37 to - 2.3; RTX vs corticosteroids: lnOR - 2.52, 95% CrI - 0.32 to - 4.86). In EDSS score, no statistical difference was found between different interventions.

Conclusion: RTX and tocilizumab showed better efficacy than traditional immunosuppressants in reducing relapse. For safety, MMF and RTX had fewer AEs. However, studies with larger sample size on newly developed monoclonal antibodies are warranted in the future.

Citing Articles

A real-world study on the utility of regular rituximab treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Chen X, Wang R, Li R, Hu S, Shi Z, Zhou H J Neurol. 2025; 272(3):194.

PMID: 39932569 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-025-12937-0.


Treatment access and satisfaction on disease-modifying therapies of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients in China: a cross-sectional survey.

Yu Y, Zhong M, Quan C, Ma C Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024; 17:17562864241239105.

PMID: 38525489 PMC: 10960978. DOI: 10.1177/17562864241239105.

References
1.
Sellner J, Boggild M, Clanet M, Hintzen R, Illes Z, Montalban X . EFNS guidelines on diagnosis and management of neuromyelitis optica. Eur J Neurol. 2010; 17(8):1019-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03066.x. View

2.
Watanabe S, Misu T, Miyazawa I, Nakashima I, Shiga Y, Fujihara K . Low-dose corticosteroids reduce relapses in neuromyelitis optica: a retrospective analysis. Mult Scler. 2007; 13(8):968-74. DOI: 10.1177/1352458507077189. View

3.
Ringelstein M, Ayzenberg I, Harmel J, Lauenstein A, Lensch E, Stogbauer F . Long-term Therapy With Interleukin 6 Receptor Blockade in Highly Active Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. JAMA Neurol. 2015; 72(7):756-63. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0533. View

4.
Jarius S, Wildemann B, Paul F . Neuromyelitis optica: clinical features, immunopathogenesis and treatment. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014; 176(2):149-64. PMC: 3992027. DOI: 10.1111/cei.12271. View

5.
Wingerchuk D, Banwell B, Bennett J, Cabre P, Carroll W, Chitnis T . International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015; 85(2):177-89. PMC: 4515040. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001729. View