» Articles » PMID: 36883024

Comparison of Flexural Strength of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium-enriched Mixture and BioAggregate

Overview
Journal Iran Endod J
Date 2023 Mar 8
PMID 36883024
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the flexural strength of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), calcium-enriched mixture CEM), and BioAggregate (BA).

Methods And Materials: In this study, the flexural strength of materials was measured using a 3-point bend test. After being prepared, MTA, CEM, and BA were inserted into the intra-putty molds using amalgam plugger. The specimens were covered with a sponge wetted with synthetic tissue fluid (STF) and incubated for 96 h. They were then subjected to a 3-point bend test using Universal Testing Machine. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare flexural strength in groups. In this study, <0.05 was considered as the significant level.

Results: There were significant differences between the three groups in terms of the flexural strength (<0.001). The mean flexural strength in the BA, CEM, and MTA groups were 27.32±2, 9.09±1.16, and 10.25±1.6, respectively. Pairwise comparison showed significant differences between the three groups.

Conclusion: This study showed that BA has the highest and CEM has the lowest flexural strength.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive review of composition, properties, clinical applications, and future perspectives of calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement: a systematic analysis.

Asgary S, Aram M, Fazlyab M Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):96.

PMID: 39294680 PMC: 11409725. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01290-4.


Outcome Assessment of Three Different Methods of Root-end Preparation and Filling Materials in Endodontic Surgery: A Comparative Clinical Prospective Study.

Kaur I, Sroa R, Debbarma M, Pallawi S, Kumar A Contemp Clin Dent. 2024; 15(2):77-83.

PMID: 39206245 PMC: 11349068. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_570_23.


Effect of Different Mixing Methods on Physicochemical Properties of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Systematic Review.

Milani A, Radmand F, Rahbani B, Hadilou M, Haji Abbas Oghli F, Salehnia F Int J Dent. 2023; 2023:5226095.

PMID: 36845631 PMC: 9949954. DOI: 10.1155/2023/5226095.

References
1.
Walker M, Diliberto A, Lee C . Effect of setting conditions on mineral trioxide aggregate flexural strength. J Endod. 2006; 32(4):334-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.012. View

2.
Asgary S, Eghbal M, Parirokh M, Ghanavati F, Rahimi H . A comparative study of histologic response to different pulp capping materials and a novel endodontic cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 106(4):609-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.06.006. View

3.
Blum J, Micallef J . Preliminary study of the forces developed by practitioners during amalgam condensation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000; 19(4):379-85. View

4.
Basturk F, Nekoofar M, Gunday M, Dummer P . Effect of various mixing and placement techniques on the flexural strength and porosity of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2014; 40(3):441-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.010. View

5.
Park J, Hong S, Kim J, Lee S, Shin S . X-Ray diffraction analysis of white ProRoot MTA and Diadent BioAggregate. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 109(1):155-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.039. View