» Articles » PMID: 36879431

Using Item Response Times in Online Questionnaires to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment

Abstract

Objectives: With the increase in web-based data collection, response times (RTs) for survey items have become a readily available byproduct in most online studies. We examined whether RTs in online questionnaires can prospectively discriminate between cognitively normal respondents and those with cognitive impairment, no dementia (CIND).

Method: Participants were 943 members of a nationally representative internet panel, aged 50 and older. We analyzed RTs that were passively recorded as paradata for 37 surveys (1,053 items) administered online over 6.5 years. A multilevel location-scale model derived 3 RT parameters for each survey: (1) a respondent's average RT and 2 components of intraindividual RT variability addressing (2) systematic RT adjustments and (3) unsystematic RT fluctuations. CIND status was determined at the end of the 6.5-year period.

Results: All 3 RT parameters were significantly associated with CIND, with a combined predictive accuracy of area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.74. Slower average RTs, smaller systematic RT adjustments, and greater unsystematic RT fluctuations prospectively predicted a greater likelihood of CIND over periods of up to 6.5, 4.5, and 1.5 years, respectively.

Discussion: RTs for survey items are a potential early indicator of CIND, which may enhance analyses of predictors, correlates, and consequences of cognitive impairment in online survey research.

Citing Articles

Normative study of SATURN: a digital, self-administered, open-source cognitive assessment tool for Italians aged 50-80.

Giaquinto F, Assecondi S, Leccese G, Romano D, Angelelli P Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1456619.

PMID: 39539307 PMC: 11557479. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1456619.


Early Identification of Cognitive Impairment in Community Environments Through Modeling Subtle Inconsistencies in Questionnaire Responses: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation.

Gao H, Schneider S, Hernandez R, Harris J, Maupin D, Junghaenel D JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e54335.

PMID: 39536306 PMC: 11602764. DOI: 10.2196/54335.


The Understanding America Study (UAS).

Kapteyn A, Angrisani M, Darling J, Gutsche T BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e088183.

PMID: 39448221 PMC: 11499792. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088183.

References
1.
Casas-Cordero C, Kreuter F, Wang Y, Babey S . Assessing the measurement error properties of interviewer observations of neighbourhood characteristics. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2013; 176(1):227-249. PMC: 3804382. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01065.x. View

2.
Forstmann B, Anwander A, Schafer A, Neumann J, Brown S, Wagenmakers E . Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(36):15916-20. PMC: 2936628. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1004932107. View

3.
Haynes B, Bauermeister S, Bunce D . A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Associations Between Reaction Time Intraindividual Variability and Age-Related Cognitive Decline or Impairment, Dementia, and Mortality. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017; 23(5):431-445. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617717000236. View

4.
Cummings J, Aisen P, Dubois B, Frolich L, Jack Jr C, Jones R . Drug development in Alzheimer's disease: the path to 2025. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016; 8:39. PMC: 5028936. DOI: 10.1186/s13195-016-0207-9. View

5.
Verlinden V, van der Geest J, de Bruijn R, Hofman A, Koudstaal P, Ikram M . Trajectories of decline in cognition and daily functioning in preclinical dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2015; 12(2):144-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.08.001. View