» Articles » PMID: 36877439

Implicit, But Not Explicit, Emotion Regulation Relieves Unpleasant Neural Responses Evoked by High-Intensity Negative Images

Overview
Journal Neurosci Bull
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Mar 6
PMID 36877439
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evidence suggests that explicit reappraisal has limited regulatory effects on high-intensity emotions, mainly due to the depletion of cognitive resources occupied by the high-intensity emotional stimulus itself. The implicit form of reappraisal has proved to be resource-saving and therefore might be an ideal strategy to achieve the desired regulatory effect in high-intensity situations. In this study, we explored the regulatory effect of explicit and implicit reappraisal when participants encountered low- and high-intensity negative images. The subjective emotional rating indicated that both explicit and implicit reappraisal down-regulated negative experiences, irrespective of intensity. However, the amplitude of the parietal late positive potential (LPP; a neural index of experienced emotional intensity) showed that only implicit reappraisal had significant regulatory effects in the high-intensity context, though both explicit and implicit reappraisal successfully reduced the emotional neural responses elicited by low-intensity negative images. Meanwhile, implicit reappraisal led to a smaller frontal LPP amplitude (an index of cognitive cost) compared to explicit reappraisal, indicating that the implementation of implicit reappraisal consumes limited cognitive control resources. Furthermore, we found a prolonged effect of implicit emotion regulation introduced by training procedures. Taken together, these findings not only reveal that implicit reappraisal is suitable to relieve high-intensity negative experiences as well as neural responses, but also highlight the potential benefit of trained implicit regulation in clinical populations whose frontal control resources are limited.

Citing Articles

The ventromedial prefrontal cortex plays an important role in implicit emotion regulation: A focality-optimized multichannel tDCS study in anxiety individuals.

Gao K, Wong A, Li S, Zhang Y, Zhang D Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(13):e26812.

PMID: 39254109 PMC: 11386327. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26812.

References
1.
McRae K, Gross J . Emotion regulation. Emotion. 2020; 20(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000703. View

2.
Webb T, Miles E, Sheeran P . Dealing with feeling: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychol Bull. 2012; 138(4):775-808. DOI: 10.1037/a0027600. View

3.
Dorfel D, Lamke J, Hummel F, Wagner U, Erk S, Walter H . Common and differential neural networks of emotion regulation by Detachment, Reinterpretation, Distraction, and Expressive Suppression: a comparative fMRI investigation. Neuroimage. 2014; 101:298-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.051. View

4.
Goldin P, McRae K, Ramel W, Gross J . The neural bases of emotion regulation: reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biol Psychiatry. 2007; 63(6):577-86. PMC: 2483789. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.031. View

5.
Guex R, Hofstetter C, Dominguez-Borras J, Mendez-Bertolo C, Sterpenich V, Spinelli L . Neurophysiological evidence for early modulation of amygdala activity by emotional reappraisal. Biol Psychol. 2019; 145:211-223. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.05.006. View