» Articles » PMID: 36877330

Cranial Meningioma with Bone Involvement: Surgical Strategies and Clinical Considerations

Abstract

Background: Intracranial meningioma with bone involvement and primary intraosseous meningioma is uncommon. There is currently no consensus for optimal management. This study aimed to describe the management strategy and outcomes for a 10-year illustrative cohort, and propose an algorithm to aid clinicians in selecting cranioplasty material in such patients.

Methods: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study (January 2010-August 2021). All adult patients requiring cranial reconstruction due to meningioma with bone involvement or primary intraosseous meningioma were included. Baseline patient and meningioma characteristics, surgical strategy, and surgical morbidity were examined. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS v24.0. Data visualisation was performed using R v4.1.0.

Results: Thirty-three patients were identified (mean age 56 years; SD 15) There were 19 females. Twenty-nine patients had secondary bone involvement (88%). Four had primary intraosseous meningioma (12%). Nineteen had gross total resection (GTR; 58%). Thirty had primary 'on-table' cranioplasty (91%). Cranioplasty materials included pre-fabricated polymethyl methacrylate (pPMMA) (n = 12; 36%), titanium mesh (n = 10; 30%), hand-moulded polymethyl methacrylate cement (hPMMA) (n = 4; 12%), pre-fabricated titanium plate (n = 4; 12%), hydroxyapatite (n = 2; 6%), and a single case combining titanium mesh with hPMMA cement (n = 1; 3%). Five patients required reoperation for a postoperative complication (15%).

Conclusion: Meningioma with bone involvement and primary intraosseous meningioma often requires cranial reconstruction, but this may not be evident prior to surgical resection. Our experience demonstrates that a wide variety of materials have been used successfully, but that pre-fabricated materials may be associated with fewer postoperative complications. Further research within this population is warranted to identify the most appropriate operative strategy.

Citing Articles

Intra-operative extracorporeal irradiation of tumour-invaded craniotomy bone flap in meningioma: a case series.

Cook W, Burton K, Jefferies S, Duke S, Jena R, Burnet N Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024; 166(1):229.

PMID: 38787452 PMC: 11126431. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06126-7.


Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of atypical meningiomas with bone invasion: a retrospective analysis of nine cases and literature review.

Cucu A, Costea C, Macovei G, Dumitrescu G, Sava A, Blaj L Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2024; 64(4):509-515.

PMID: 38184831 PMC: 10863686. DOI: 10.47162/RJME.64.4.07.

References
1.
Lindner D, Schlothofer-Schumann K, Kern B, Marx O, Muns A, Meixensberger J . Cranioplasty using custom-made hydroxyapatite versus titanium: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurosurg. 2016; 126(1):175-183. DOI: 10.3171/2015.10.JNS151245. View

2.
Simpson D . The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1957; 20(1):22-39. PMC: 497230. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.20.1.22. View

3.
Pieper D, Al-Mefty O, Hanada Y, Buechner D . Hyperostosis associated with meningioma of the cranial base: secondary changes or tumor invasion. Neurosurgery. 1999; 44(4):742-6; discussion 746-7. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199904000-00028. View

4.
Sahoo N, Tomar K, Thakral A, Rangan N . Complications of Cranioplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2018; 29(5):1344-1348. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004478. View

5.
Bloch O, McDermott M . In situ cranioplasty for hyperostosing meningiomas of the cranial vault. Can J Neurol Sci. 2010; 38(1):59-64. DOI: 10.1017/s0317167100011082. View