» Articles » PMID: 36870476

Modified Isotonic Regression Based Phase I/II Clinical Trial Design Identifying Optimal Biological Dose

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2023 Mar 4
PMID 36870476
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conventional phase I/II clinical trial designs often use complicated parametric models to characterize the dose-response relationships and conduct the trials. However, the parametric models are hard to justify in practice, and the misspecification of parametric models can lead to substantially undesirable performances in phase I/II trials. Moreover, it is difficult for the physicians conducting phase I/II trials to clinically interpret the parameters of these complicated models, and such significant learning costs impede the translation of novel statistical designs into practical trial implementation. To solve these issues, we propose a transparent and efficient phase I/II clinical trial design, referred to as the modified isotonic regression-based design (mISO), to identify the optimal biological doses for molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapy. The mISO design makes no parametric model assumptions on the dose-response relationship and yields desirable performances under any clinically meaningful dose-response curves. The concise, clinically interpretable dose-response models and dose-finding algorithm make the proposed designs highly translational from the statistical community to the clinical community. We further extend the mISO design and develop the mISO-B design to handle the delayed outcomes. Our comprehensive simulation studies show that the mISO and mISO-B designs are highly efficient in optimal biological dose selection and patients allocation and outperform many existing phase I/II clinical trial designs. We also provide a trial example to illustrate the practical implementation of the proposed designs. The software for simulation and trial implementation are available for free download.

Citing Articles

A Bayesian Dynamic Model-Based Adaptive Design for Oncology Dose Optimization in Phase I/II Clinical Trials.

Qiu Y, Li M Pharm Stat. 2024; 24(2):e2451.

PMID: 39523598 PMC: 11889989. DOI: 10.1002/pst.2451.


Explainable machine learning prediction of edema adverse events in patients treated with tepotinib.

Amato F, Strotmann R, Castello R, Bruns R, Ghori V, Johne A Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 17(9):e70010.

PMID: 39222377 PMC: 11368086. DOI: 10.1111/cts.70010.


REDOMA: Bayesian random-effects dose-optimization meta-analysis using spike-and-slab priors.

Yang C, Kwiatkowski E, Lee J, Lin R Stat Med. 2024; 43(18):3484-3502.

PMID: 38857904 PMC: 11789924. DOI: 10.1002/sim.10107.


Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies.

Zang Y, Guo B, Qiu Y, Liu H, Opyrchal M, Lu X Clin Trials. 2024; 21(3):298-307.

PMID: 38205644 PMC: 11132954. DOI: 10.1177/17407745231220661.

References
1.
Hoering A, LeBlanc M, Crowley J . Seamless phase I-II trial design for assessing toxicity and efficacy for targeted agents. Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 17(4):640-6. PMC: 4391513. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1262. View

2.
Thall P, Nguyen H, Braun T, Qazilbash M . Using joint utilities of the times to response and toxicity to adaptively optimize schedule-dose regimes. Biometrics. 2013; 69(3):673-82. PMC: 3963428. DOI: 10.1111/biom.12065. View

3.
Ivanova A, Flournoy N . Comparison of Isotonic Designs for Dose-Finding. Stat Biopharm Res. 2010; 1(1):101. PMC: 2821065. DOI: 10.1198/sbr.2009.0010. View

4.
Houede N, Thall P, Nguyen H, Paoletti X, Kramar A . Utility-based optimization of combination therapy using ordinal toxicity and efficacy in phase I/II trials. Biometrics. 2009; 66(2):532-40. PMC: 2893272. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01302.x. View

5.
Zhang Y, Guo B, Cao S, Zhang C, Zang Y . SCI: A Bayesian adaptive phase I/II dose-finding design accounting for semi-competing risks outcomes for immunotherapy trials. Pharm Stat. 2022; 21(5):960-973. PMC: 9481656. DOI: 10.1002/pst.2209. View