» Articles » PMID: 36869268

A Reassessment of the Role of Joint Receptors in Human Position Sense

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Mar 3
PMID 36869268
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the past, the peripheral sense organs responsible for generating human position sense were thought to be the slowly adapting receptors in joints. More recently, our views have changed and the principal position sensor is now believed to be the muscle spindle. Joint receptors have been relegated to the lesser role of acting as limit detectors when movements approach the anatomical limit of a joint. In a recent experiment concerned with position sense at the elbow joint, measured in a pointing task over a range of forearm angles, we have observed falls in position errors as the forearm was moved closer to the limit of extension. We considered the possibility that as the arm approached full extension, a population of joint receptors became engaged and that they were responsible for the changes in position errors. Muscle vibration selectively engages signals of muscle spindles. Vibration of elbow muscles undergoing stretch has been reported to lead to perception of elbow angles beyond the anatomical limit of the joint. The result suggests that spindles, by themselves, cannot signal the limit of joint movement. We hypothesise that over the portion of the elbow angle range where joint receptors become active, their signals are combined with those of spindles to produce a composite that contains joint limit information. As the arm is extended, the growing influence of the joint receptor signal is evidenced by the fall in position errors.

Citing Articles

Adaptive walking performance is related to the hip joint position sense during active hip flexion rather than during passive hip flexion.

Matsui T, Hirata K, Miyamoto N, Akagi R Front Sports Act Living. 2025; 7:1510447.

PMID: 40017816 PMC: 11865228. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1510447.


The contribution of muscle spindles to position sense measured with three different methods.

Roach C, Love C, Allen T, Proske U Exp Brain Res. 2023; 241(10):2433-2450.

PMID: 37653105 PMC: 10520194. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06689-4.


Proprioceptive disturbances in weightlessness revisited.

Proske U, Weber B NPJ Microgravity. 2023; 9(1):64.

PMID: 37567869 PMC: 10421854. DOI: 10.1038/s41526-023-00318-8.

References
1.
Botvinick M, Cohen J . Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature. 1998; 391(6669):756. DOI: 10.1038/35784. View

2.
BURGESS P, CLARK F . Characteristics of knee joint receptors in the cat. J Physiol. 1969; 203(2):317-35. PMC: 1351447. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008866. View

3.
Burke D, Gandevia S, Macefield G . Responses to passive movement of receptors in joint, skin and muscle of the human hand. J Physiol. 1988; 402:347-61. PMC: 1191895. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017208. View

4.
Chen B, Allen T, Proske U . Position sense at the human forearm over a range of elbow angles. Exp Brain Res. 2021; 239(2):675-686. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05999-1. View

5.
CLARK F, Horch K, BACH S, Larson G . Contributions of cutaneous and joint receptors to static knee-position sense in man. J Neurophysiol. 1979; 42(3):877-88. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.3.877. View