» Articles » PMID: 36867524

30-Day Postoperative Complications After Surgical Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Mar 3
PMID 36867524
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors associated with complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

Methods: A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was conducted. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients treated for proximal humerus fracture with reverse TSA or hemiarthroplasty between 2005 and 2018.

Results: One thousand five hundred sixty-three shoulder arthroplasties were conducted: 436 hemiarthroplasties and 1,127 reverse TSA. The overall complication rate was 15.4% (15.7% reverse TSA; 14.7% hemiarthroplasty) (P = 0.636). Most frequent complications included transfusion 11.1%, unplanned readmission 3.8%, and revision surgery 2.1%. A 1.1% incidence of thromboembolic events was noted. Complications occurred most frequently in patients older than 65 years; male; and patients with anemia, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III-IV, inpatient procedure, bleeding disorders, duration of surgery >106 minutes, and length of stay >2.5 days. Patients with body mass index >36 kg/m2 had a decreased risk of 30-day postoperative complications.

Discussion: There was a 15.4% complication rate in the early postoperative period. In addition, no notable difference was found in complication rates between groups (hemiarthroplasty: 14.7%; reverse TSA 15.7%). Future studies are needed to determine whether there is a difference between these groups in the long-term outcome and survivorship of these implants.

Citing Articles

Complications following shoulder arthroplasty: A review of the recent literature.

Faria G, Ali Z, Rasheed M, Abdelwahab A, Mohan H, Bakti N J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025; 60:102850.

PMID: 39759466 PMC: 11697276. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102850.

References
1.
Neer 2nd C . Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970; 52(6):1090-103. View

2.
Rosas S, Law T, Kurowicki J, Formaini N, Kalandiak S, Levy J . Trends in surgical management of proximal humeral fractures in the Medicare population: a nationwide study of records from 2009 to 2012. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 25(4):608-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.011. View

3.
Cuff D, Pupello D . Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(22):2050-5. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01637. View

4.
Bonnevialle N, Tournier C, Clavert P, Ohl X, Sirveaux F, Saragaglia D . Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 4-part displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: Multicenter retrospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016; 102(5):569-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.02.014. View

5.
Schairer W, Nwachukwu B, Lyman S, Craig E, Gulotta L . Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24(10):1560-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.03.018. View