Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Large Malignant Thymic Epithelial Tumors and for Total Thymectomy

Overview

Journal Surg Today

Specialty General Surgery

Date 2023 Mar 3

PMID 36867230

Authors

Masayoshi Inoue

Hiroyuki Yamamoto

Yoshinori Okada

Toshihiko Sato

Yukio Sato

Kenji Suzuki

Ichiro Yoshino

Masayuki Chida

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for thymic tumors is now accepted widely, in line with improved surgical techniques; however, we occasionally encounter complicated cases of large tumors or of total thymectomy requiring prolonged operative duration or conversion to an open procedure (OP). We reviewed patients registered in a nationwide database to identify the technical feasibility of MIS for thymic epithelial tumors.

Methods: Data on patients treated surgically between 2017 and 2019 were extracted from the National Clinical Database of Japan. Clinical factors and operative outcomes were calculated by tumor diameter using trend analyses. Perioperative outcomes of MIS for non-invasive thymoma were investigated using propensity score-matched analyses.

Results: MIS was performed in 46.2% of the patients. The operative duration and conversion rate increased with the tumor diameter (p < .001). After propensity score-matching, operative duration and postoperative hospital stay were shorter (p < .001), and the transfusion rate was lower (p = .007) in patients who underwent MIS than in those who underwent OP for thymomas ≥ 5 cm. Among patients who underwent total thymectomy, blood loss was less (p < .001) and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter (p < .001) in those who underwent MIS than in those who underwent OP. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications and mortality.

Conclusions: MIS is technically feasible even for large non-invasive thymomas or for total thymectomy, although the operative duration and open conversion rate increase with the tumor diameter.

References

Friedant A, Handorf E, Su S, Scott W . Minimally Invasive versus Open Thymectomy for Thymic Malignancies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Thorac Oncol. 2016; 11(1):30-8. PMC: 7560956. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.08.004. View

Burt B, Yao X, Shrager J, Antonicelli A, Padda S, Reiss J . Determinants of Complete Resection of Thymoma by Minimally Invasive and Open Thymectomy: Analysis of an International Registry. J Thorac Oncol. 2016; 12(1):129-136. PMC: 5428544. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.08.131. View

Salfity H, Timsina L, Ceppa D, Birdas T . Minimally invasive surgery in the management of resectable thymoma: a retrospective analysis from the National Cancer Database. J Thorac Dis. 2022; 13(11):6353-6362. PMC: 8662507. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-2660. View

Marulli G, Rea F, Melfi F, Schmid T, Ismail M, Fanucchi O . Robot-aided thoracoscopic thymectomy for early-stage thymoma: a multicenter European study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144(5):1125-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.082. View

Raja S, Guptill J, McConnell A, Al-Khalidi H, Hartwig M, Klapper J . Perioperative Outcomes of Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis: A Thoracic Surgery Database Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021; 113(3):904-910. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.06.071. View

Masaoka A, Yamakawa Y, Niwa H, Fukai I, Kondo S, Kobayashi M . Extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis patients: a 20-year review. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996; 62(3):853-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(96)00376-1. View

Endo S, Ikeda N, Kondo T, Nakajima J, Kondo H, Yokoi K . Development of an annually updated Japanese national clinical database for chest surgery in 2014. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 64(10):569-76. PMC: 5035318. DOI: 10.1007/s11748-016-0697-1. View

Okumura M, Yoshino I, Yano M, Watanabe S, Tsuboi M, Yoshida K . Tumour size determines both recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival after surgical treatment for thymoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 56(1):174-181. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz001. View

Yang C, Hurd J, Shah S, Liou D, Wang H, Backhus L . A national analysis of open versus minimally invasive thymectomy for stage I to III thymoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 160(2):555-567.e15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.114. View

10.

Jurado J, Javidfar J, Newmark A, Lavelle M, Bacchetta M, Gorenstein L . Minimally invasive thymectomy and open thymectomy: outcome analysis of 263 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 94(3):974-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.097. View

11.

Tagawa T, Yamasaki N, Tsuchiya T, Miyazaki T, Morino S, Akamine S . Thoracoscopic versus transsternal resection for early stage thymoma: long-term outcomes. Surg Today. 2014; 44(12):2275-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-013-0829-5. View

12.

Gu Z, Chen C, Wang Y, Wei Y, Fu J, Zhang P . Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open surgery for Stage I thymic epithelial tumours: a propensity score-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018; 54(6):1037-1044. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy239. View

13.

Manoly I, Whistance R, Sreekumar R, Khawaja S, Horton J, Khan A . Early and mid-term outcomes of trans-sternal and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for thymoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 45(6):e187-93. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu077. View

14.

Hess N, Sarkaria I, Pennathur A, Levy R, Christie N, Luketich J . Minimally invasive versus open thymectomy: a systematic review of surgical techniques, patient demographics, and perioperative outcomes. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 5(1):1-9. PMC: 4740099. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2016.01.01. View

15.

Burt B, Nguyen D, Groth S, Palivela N, Ripley R, Makris K . Utilization of Minimally Invasive Thymectomy and Margin-Negative Resection for Early-Stage Thymoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 108(2):405-411. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.010. View

16.

Pennathur A, Qureshi I, Schuchert M, Dhupar R, Ferson P, Gooding W . Comparison of surgical techniques for early-stage thymoma: feasibility of minimally invasive thymectomy and comparison with open resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 141(3):694-701. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.003. View

17.

Odaka M, Tsukamoto Y, Shibasaki T, Katou D, Mori S, Asano H . Thoracoscopic thymectomy is a feasible and less invasive alternative for the surgical treatment of large thymomas. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017; 25(1):103-108. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivx048. View

18.

Weng W, Li X, Meng S, Liu X, Peng P, Wang Z . Video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy is feasible for large thymomas: a propensity-matched comparison. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020; 30(4):565-572. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivz320. View

19.

Kimura T, Inoue M, Kadota Y, Shiono H, Shintani Y, Nakagiri T . The oncological feasibility and limitations of video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for early-stage thymomas. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013; 44(3):e214-8. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt305. View

20.

Nakagiri T, Inoue M, Shintani Y, Funaki S, Kawamura T, Minami M . Improved procedures and comparative results for video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Surg Endosc. 2014; 29(9):2859-65. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3964-1. View