» Articles » PMID: 36865903

Trends in LDL-C Following Coronary Angiography Involving Assessment by Fractional Flow Reserve in Obstructive Vs Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Overview
Date 2023 Mar 3
PMID 36865903
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We sought to determine whether management of LDL-C following invasive angiography and assessment by fractional flow reserve (FFR) differs between those with obstructive vs non-obstructive CAD.

Methods: Retrospective study of 721 patients undergoing coronary angiography involving assessment by FFR between 2013 and 2020 at a single academic center. Groups with obstructive vs non-obstructive CAD by index angiographic and FFR findings were compared over 1 year of follow-up.

Results: Based on index angiographic and FFR findings, 421 (58%) patients had obstructive CAD vs 300 (42%) with non-obstructive CAD, mean (±SD) age 66±11 years, 217 (30%) women, and 594 (82%) white. There was no difference in baseline LDL-C. At 3-months follow-up, LDL-C was lower than baseline in both groups, with no between group difference. In contrast, at 6-months, median (Q1, Q3) LDL-C was significantly higher in non-obstructive vs obstructive CAD (LDL-C 73 (60, 93) vs 63 (48, 77) mg/dL, respectively ( = 0.003), ( = 0.001 in multivariable linear regression)). At 12-months, LDL-C remained higher in non-obstructive vs obstructive CAD (LDL-C 73 (49, 86) vs 64 (48, 79) mg/dL, respectively, although not statistically significant ( = 0.104)). The rate of high-intensity statin use was lower among those with non-obstructive CAD vs obstructive CAD at all time points ( < 0.05).

Conclusions: After coronary angiography involving FFR, there is intensification of LDL-C lowering at 3-months follow-up in both obstructive and non-obstructive CAD. However, by 6-months follow-up LDL-C is significantly higher among those with non-obstructive CAD vs obstructive CAD. Following coronary angiography involving FFR, patients with non-obstructive CAD may benefit from greater attention to LDL-C lowering to reduce residual ASCVD risk.

References
1.
Nakamura S, Yamamoto T, Teng Y, Matsumoto S, Kasano K, Yoshiwara H . Impact of intensively lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on deferred lesion prognosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 95(4):E100-E107. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28345. View

2.
Falk E, Shah P, Fuster V . Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation. 1995; 92(3):657-71. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.3.657. View

3.
Ray K, Molemans B, Schoonen W, Giovas P, Bray S, Kiru G . EU-Wide Cross-Sectional Observational Study of Lipid-Modifying Therapy Use in Secondary and Primary Care: the DA VINCI study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021; 28(11):1279-1289. DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa047. View

4.
LaRosa J, Grundy S, Waters D, Shear C, Barter P, Fruchart J . Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(14):1425-35. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa050461. View

5.
Cannon C, de Lemos J, Rosenson R, Ballantyne C, Liu Y, Gao Q . Use of Lipid-Lowering Therapies Over 2 Years in GOULD, a Registry of Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the US. JAMA Cardiol. 2021; 6(9):1060-1068. PMC: 8209562. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.1810. View