» Articles » PMID: 36865472

Superiority of Bivalirudin over Heparin Anticoagulation Therapy for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation? Too Early to Draw Conclusions

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 Mar 3
PMID 36865472
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparin as the anticoagulant in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Methods: We conducted a search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for all the studies in which bivalirudin was compared to heparin as the anticoagulant for ECMO. Efficacy outcomes were defined as the time to reach therapeutic levels, time within therapeutic range (TTR), thrombotic events, circuit thrombosis, circuit exchanges. Safety outcomes were reported as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), major bleeding events, minor bleeding events. Other outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, mortality, 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality.

Results: Ten studies with 1091 patients were included for meta-analysis. A significant reduction in thrombotic events [OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.36,0.73,  = 0.0002, I = 0%], major bleeding events [OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.10,0.92,  = 0.04, I = 75%] and in-hospital mortality [OR 0.63, 95%CI 0.44,0.89,  = 0.009, I = 0%] treated with bivalirudin were found compared with heparin. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the time to reach therapeutic levels [MD 3.53, 95%CI -4.02,11.09,  = 0.36, I = 49%], TTR [MD 8.64, 95%CI -1.72,18.65,  = 0.10, I = 77%], circuit exchanges [OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.27,3.12,  = 0.90, I = 38%], HIT [OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.02,2.52,  = 0.24, I = 0%], minor bleeding events [OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.38,2.29,  = 0.87, I = 0%], hospital LOS [MD -2.93, 95%CI -9.01,3.15,  = 0.34, I = 45%], ICU LOS [MD -4.22, 95%CI -10.07,1.62,  = 0.16, I = 0%], mortality [OR 1.84, 95%CI 0.58,5.85,  = 0.30, I = 60%] and 30-day mortality [OR 0.75, 95%CI 0.38,1.48,  = 0.41, I = 0%].

Conclusion: Bivalirudin probably be a potential choice for ECMO anticoagulation. However, based on the included studies' limitation, the superiority of bivalirudin over heparin for anticoagulation in the ECMO population still require further prospective randomized controlled studies before a definite conclusion.

Citing Articles

Is it time to switch to bivalirudin for ECMO anticoagulation?.

Navaei A, Kostousov V, Teruya J Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1237601.

PMID: 37671395 PMC: 10476497. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1237601.

References
1.
Rehers S, Beiderlinden M, Ziegeler S . [Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Thoracic Surgery: the Anesthesiologist's Perspective]. Zentralbl Chir. 2019; 144(1):86-92. DOI: 10.1055/a-0774-8151. View

2.
Machado D, Garvan C, Philip J, Harrington D, Spiess B, Kelly B . Bivalirudin May Reduce the Need for Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Pediatric Cardiac Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2020; 67(6):688-696. DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001291. View

3.
Kaseer H, Soto-Arenall M, Sanghavi D, Moss J, Ratzlaff R, Pham S . Heparin vs bivalirudin anticoagulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Card Surg. 2020; 35(4):779-786. DOI: 10.1111/jocs.14458. View

4.
Kini A, Yu J, Cohen M, Mehran R, Baber U, Sartori S . Effect of bivalirudin on aortic valve intervention outcomes study: a two-centre registry study comparing bivalirudin and unfractionated heparin in balloon aortic valvuloplasty. EuroIntervention. 2013; 10(3):312-9. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV10I3A54. View

5.
Dangas G, Lefevre T, Kupatt C, Tchetche D, Schafer U, Dumonteil N . Bivalirudin Versus Heparin Anticoagulation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized BRAVO-3 Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66(25):2860-2868. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.003. View