» Articles » PMID: 36862348

Robotic Revision Surgery After Failed Nissen Anti-reflux Surgery: a Single Center Experience and a Literature Review

Abstract

Background: The gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) worldwide prevalence is increasing maybe due to population aging and the obesity epidemic. Nissen fundoplication is the most common surgical procedure for GERD with a failure rate of approximately 20% which might require a redo surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of robotic redo procedures after anti-reflux surgery failure including a narrative review.

Methods: We reviewed our 15-year experience from 2005 to 2020 including 317 procedures, 306 for primary, and 11 for revisional surgery.

Results: Patients included in the redo series underwent primary Nissen fundoplication with a mean age of 57.6 years (range, 43-71). All procedures were minimally invasive and no conversion to open surgery was registered. The meshes were used in five (45.45%) patients. The mean operative time was 147 min (range, 110-225) and the mean hospital stay was 3.2 days (range, 2-7). At a mean follow-up of 78 months (range, 18-192), one patient suffered for persistent dysphagia and one for delayed gastric emptying. We had two (18.19%) Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa complications, consisting of postoperative pneumothoraxes treated with chest drainage.

Conclusion: Redo anti-reflux surgery is indicated in selected patients and the robotic approach is safe when it is performed in specialized centers, considering its surgical technical difficulty.

Citing Articles

Robotic hiatus hernia surgery: learning curve and lessons learned.

Garsot E, Company-Se G, Clavell A, Viciano M, Herrero C, Nescolarde L J Robot Surg. 2025; 19(1):51.

PMID: 39821364 PMC: 11742325. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02191-3.


Robotic versus laparoscopic revision to Toupet fundoplication for failed Nissen fundoplication: a single-center experience.

Evans L, Cornejo J, Akkapulu N, Bowers S, Elli E J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):397.

PMID: 39508953 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02124-0.


Emergency robotic surgery: the experience of a single center and review of the literature.

Ceccarelli G, Catena F, Avella P, Tian B, Rondelli F, Guerra G World J Emerg Surg. 2024; 19(1):28.

PMID: 39154016 PMC: 11330055. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00555-6.


Future Perspectives on Radiomics in Acute Liver Injury and Liver Trauma.

Brunese M, Avella P, Cappuccio M, Spiezia S, Pacella G, Bianco P J Pers Med. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38929793 PMC: 11204538. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14060572.


Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Update of CT-Based Radiomics Applications in the Pre-Surgical Prediction of the Risk of Post-Operative Fistula, Resectability Status and Prognosis.

Pacella G, Brunese M, DImperio E, Rotondo M, Scacchi A, Carbone M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(23).

PMID: 38068432 PMC: 10707069. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237380.

References
1.
Sweis R, Fox M . The global burden of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: more than just heartburn and regurgitation. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 5(6):519-521. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30002-9. View

2.
Dallemagne B, Weerts J, Jehaes C, Markiewicz S, Lombard R . Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991; 1(3):138-43. View

3.
Bais J, Horbach T, Masclee A, Smout A, TERPSTRA J, Gooszen H . Surgical treatment for recurrent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease after failed antireflux surgery. Br J Surg. 2000; 87(2):243-249X. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01299.x. View

4.
Humphries L, Hernandez J, Clark W, Luberice K, Ross S, Rosemurgy A . Causes of dissatisfaction after laparoscopic fundoplication: the impact of new symptoms, recurrent symptoms, and the patient experience. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(5):1537-45. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2611-y. View

5.
Schlottmann F, Laxague F, Angeramo C, Sadava E, Herbella F, Patti M . Outcomes of Laparoscopic Redo Fundoplication in Patients With Failed Antireflux Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2020; 274(1):78-85. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004639. View