» Articles » PMID: 36856101

Effects of Traditional Stretching Versus Self-myofascial Release Warm-up on Physical Performance in Well-trained Female Athletes

Overview
Date 2023 Mar 1
PMID 36856101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the acute effects of self-myofascial release (SMR) versus traditional stretching used as a part of warm-up on physical performance in well-trained female athletes.

Methods: Twenty-three participants (age, 21.8±1.73 years; experience in sport, 114.8±30.5 months) were recruited. Isokinetic peak torque and muscle endurance ratio were measured during knee extension and flexion at 60°/s and 180°/s. Jump height, reactive strength index, and leg stiffness were measured using a jump mat during a counter-movement jump. Hamstring flexibility was measured using a sit-and-reach test. Three interventions were performed by all athletes randomly within 72 hours intervals.

Results: The jump height and hamstring flexibility test scores improved significantly more after dynamic stretching (DS) as compared to SMR and static stretching (SS). The DS and SMR exercises were more effective than the SS exercises in terms of right and left knee muscle isokinetic strength both at 60°/s, and 180°/s. With regard to keeping muscular endurance ratio (%), SS exercises were found more effective than DS and SMR exercises for only the right knee at 180°/s, but not left knee muscle.

Conclusion: Dynamic stretching and SMR showed better flexibility, strength, and jump performance than SS. Trainers and players may replace SS with DS and SMR to acutely improve muscle power, strength, and flexibility.

Citing Articles

Effects of Workplace Supervised Exercise on Psychological Capital: An Intervention Study.

Salvador-Ferrer C, Diaz-Funez P, Carrera-Ruiz A, Monserrat-Hernandez M, Artero E, Manas-Rodriguez M Sports (Basel). 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39852598 PMC: 11769115. DOI: 10.3390/sports13010002.


Fatigue and recovery-related changes in postural and core stability in sedentary employees: a study protocol.

Amiri B, Zemkova E Front Physiol. 2025; 15():1490041.

PMID: 39777355 PMC: 11703915. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1490041.


A Review of the Application of Myofascial Release Therapy in the Treatment of Diseases.

Lv Y, Yin Y J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:4507-4517.

PMID: 39351042 PMC: 11441305. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S481706.


Effects of Self-Myofascial Release on Athletes' Physical Performance: A Systematic Review.

Martinez-Aranda L, Sanz-Matesanz M, Garcia-Mantilla E, Gonzalez-Fernandez F J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024; 9(1).

PMID: 38249097 PMC: 10801590. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9010020.

References
1.
Alemdaroglu U, Koklu Y, Koz M . The acute effect of different stretching methods on sprint performance in taekwondo practitioners. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016; 57(9):1104-1110. DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06484-7. View

2.
Cornell D, Ebersole K . INFLUENCE OF AN ACUTE BOUT OF SELF-MYOFASCIAL RELEASE ON KNEE EXTENSION FORCE OUTPUT AND ELECTRO-MECHANICAL ACTIVATION OF THE QUADRICEPS. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020; 15(5):732-743. PMC: 7575145. DOI: 10.26603/ijspt20200732. View

3.
Pincivero D, Lephart S, Karunakara R . Reliability and precision of isokinetic strength and muscular endurance for the quadriceps and hamstrings. Int J Sports Med. 1997; 18(2):113-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-972605. View

4.
Pearcey G, Bradbury-Squires D, Kawamoto J, Drinkwater E, Behm D, Button D . Foam rolling for delayed-onset muscle soreness and recovery of dynamic performance measures. J Athl Train. 2014; 50(1):5-13. PMC: 4299735. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.1.01. View

5.
Konrad A, Tilp M, Nakamura M . A Comparison of the Effects of Foam Rolling and Stretching on Physical Performance. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Physiol. 2021; 12:720531. PMC: 8514717. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.720531. View