Evaluation of Functional Capacity and Satisfaction of Patients With Lumbosacral Fusion

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2023 Mar 1

PMID 36855476

Authors

Omer Bozduman

Omer Cahit Citir

Enes Gurun

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal fusion is a surgical procedure that has been successfully conducted for many years. It is applied for various indications, such as degeneration, deformity, instability, spinal stenosis, trauma, tumor, and infection. This study aims to determine the effects of this procedure on daily life and sleep quality by examining postoperative symptoms and refractory complaints of patients who underwent lumbosacral fusion for various indications.

Methods: The files of the patients who underwent only posterolateral lumbosacral fusion for various indications between June 2021 and July 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients who had had regular clinical follow-ups for at least six months postoperatively were included in the study. Preoperative and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores were compared using the Wilcoxon Ordinal Signs test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Twenty patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 68.2 ± 7.5 (54-79). Three (15%) of the patients were males, and seventeen (85%) were females. Improvement was observed in all three scores, i.e., VAS, ODI, and PSQI assessments. No correlation was found between the number of segments undergoing fusion, body mass index (BMI), and clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: Spinal fusion surgery is still viewed as the gold standard treatment method for many indications. Posterolateral fusion provides adequate stabilization in many cases when applied correctly. However, the possibility of persistent or newly developing low back pain in the postoperative period as a result of mechanical reasons should not be forgotten, and patients should be informed about the same. Postoperative expectations should, thus, be shaped accordingly.

References

Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J . Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(3):346-53. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65. View

PROLO D, Oklund S, Butcher M . Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986; 11(6):601-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198607000-00012. View

Unoki E, Abe E, Murai H, Kobayashi T, Abe T . Fusion of Multiple Segments Can Increase the Incidence of Sacroiliac Joint Pain After Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 41(12):999-1005. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001409. View

Dickman C, Fessler R, MacMillan M, Haid R . Transpedicular screw-rod fixation of the lumbar spine: operative technique and outcome in 104 cases. J Neurosurg. 1992; 77(6):860-70. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1992.77.6.0860. View

Yudistira A, Hutabarat M, Siahaan L, Sugiarto M . Functional outcome and fusion rates of translaminar screw fixation of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine: A case series. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022; 93:106906. PMC: 8928079. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.106906. View

Odate S, Shikata J, Kimura H, Soeda T . Sacral fracture after instrumented lumbosacral fusion: analysis of risk factors from spinopelvic parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 38(4):E223-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827dc000. View

Jajic I, Jajic Z . The prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the sacroiliac joints in an urban population. Clin Rheumatol. 1987; 6(1):39-41. DOI: 10.1007/BF02200998. View

Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P . Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(2):260-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02043. View

Ebraheim N, Elgafy H, Semaan H . Computed tomographic findings in patients with persistent sacroiliac pain after posterior iliac graft harvesting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(16):2047-51. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200008150-00008. View

10.

Ha K, Lee J, Kim K . Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(11):1192-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318170fd35. View

11.

Lenz M, Mohamud K, Bredow J, Oikonomidis S, Eysel P, Scheyerer M . Comparison of Different Approaches in Lumbosacral Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Asian Spine J. 2021; 16(1):141-149. PMC: 8873994. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0405. View

12.

Ivanov A, Kiapour A, Ebraheim N, Goel V . Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(5):E162-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181978ea3. View

13.

Frymoyer J, Howe J, Kuhlmann D . The long-term effects of spinal fusion on the sacroiliac joints and ilium. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978; (134):196-201. View

14.

Maigne J, Planchon C . Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks. Eur Spine J. 2005; 14(7):654-8. PMC: 3489225. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0692-6. View

15.

Dreyfuss P, Dreyer S, Cole A, Mayo K . Sacroiliac joint pain. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004; 12(4):255-65. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200407000-00006. View

16.

Sarotto A, Besse M, Ambrosini L, Baldassarre R, Rosado J, Baigorria J . [Lumbosacral arthrodesis in construction workers. Return to work]. Medicina (B Aires). 2021; 81(5):742-748. View

17.

Denis F . The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983; 8(8):817-31. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198311000-00003. View