» Articles » PMID: 36851684

Non-Lethal Detection of in Fish

Overview
Journal Viruses
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2023 Feb 28
PMID 36851684
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Emergent infectious diseases have an increasing impact on both farmed animals and wildlife. The ability to screen for pathogens is critical for understanding host-pathogen dynamics and informing better management. is a pathogen of concern, associated with disease outbreaks worldwide, affecting a broad range of fish, amphibian, and reptile hosts, but research has been limited. The traditional screening of internal tissues, such as the liver, has been regarded as the most effective for detecting and quantifying . However, such methodology imposes several limitations from ethical and conservation standpoints. Non-lethal sampling methods of viral detection were explored by comparing the efficacy of both buccal swabbing and fin clipping. The study was conducted on two Iberian, threatened freshwater fish ( and ), and all samples were screened using qPCR. While for both methods were reliable in detecting , on , there was a significantly higher detection rate in buccal swabs than in fin tissue. This study, therefore, reports that fin clipping may yield false negatives when in small-bodied freshwater fish. Overall, buccal swabbing is found to be good as an alternative to more invasive procedures, which is of extreme relevance, particularly when dealing with a threatened species.

References
1.
Button K, Ioannidis J, Mokrysz C, Nosek B, Flint J, Robinson E . Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013; 14(5):365-76. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3475. View

2.
Das A, Spackman E, Pantin-Jackwood M, Suarez D . Removal of real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) inhibitors associated with cloacal swab samples and tissues for improved diagnosis of Avian influenza virus by RT-PCR. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2009; 21(6):771-8. DOI: 10.1177/104063870902100603. View

3.
Tilley C, Carreno Gutierrez H, Sebire M, Obasaju O, Reichmann F, Katsiadaki I . Skin swabbing is a refined technique to collect DNA from model fish species. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):18212. PMC: 7584585. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75304-1. View

4.
Greer A, Collins J . Sensitivity of a diagnostic test for amphibian Ranavirus varies with sampling protocol. J Wildl Dis. 2007; 43(3):525-32. DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-43.3.525. View

5.
Mao J, Green D, Fellers G, Chinchar V . Molecular characterization of iridoviruses isolated from sympatric amphibians and fish. Virus Res. 1999; 63(1-2):45-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1702(99)00057-x. View