A Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Outcomes of a Single Digit Volar Plate Injury - Buddy Loops Versus dorsal Thermoplastic Orthosis in a Neutral Position: Study Protocol

Overview

Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology

Date 2023 Feb 28

PMID 36849935

Authors

Sarah Walsh

Paul Fahey

Karen Liu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Volar plate injuries are a common hand injury and complications associated with this injury such as a fixed flexion deformity, persistent pain and oedema can have a significant impact on a person's function. The literature reports these injuries are treated using various splinting materials such as thermoplastic, in varying degrees of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion or buddy loops. Despite volar plate injuries being reported as common, optimal non-surgical treatment of these injuries remains unclear. This study aims to investigate whether a dorsal blocking orthosis in a neutral position (0) is more effective than buddy loops for a volar plate injury to the proximal interphalangeal joint in preventing a fixed flexion deformity, reducing pain, managing oedema, and promoting function.

Methods: This study is a single-centre, prospective parallel-group, single blinded (assessor), randomised clinical trial. Patients between 18-65 years, who have sustained a volar plate injury to a single digit, have adequate cognitive functioning and give written informed consent will be invited to participate in this study. Patients will be randomised to either the control group where they will be fitted with buddy loops and commence early active motion exercises or the experimental group where they will receive a dorsal thermoplastic orthosis in a neutral position and commence early active motion exercises. The primary outcome measure is passive proximal interphalangeal joint extension and secondary outcome measures include passive range of motion, total passive motion, active range of motion, total active motion, grip strength, oedema, pain, function and adherence to treatment. Assessments will be completed until 8 weeks following commencement of treatment. The sample size calculation indicates that 23 patients is required in each group. With an expected dropout rate of 25% a total of 32 patients will be enrolled in each group.

Discussion: This study will assist in trying to improve treatment of volar plate injuries and assist in reducing complications associated with volar plate injuries, potentially reducing the need for prolonged hand therapy.

Trial Registration: This trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622001425785p). Ethical approval has been granted by the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District ethical committee (2022/ETH01697).

References

Paschos N, Abuhemoud K, Gantsos A, Mitsionis G, Georgoulis A . Management of proximal interphalangeal joint hyperextension injuries: a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39(3):449-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.038. View

Sandford F, Barlow N, Lewis J . A study to examine patient adherence to wearing 24-hour forearm thermoplastic splints after tendon repairs. J Hand Ther. 2008; 21(1):44-52. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2007.07.004. View

Salinas-Tovar S, Hernandez-Leyva B, Marin-Cotonieto I, Santos-Celis R, Luna-Pizarro D, Lopez-Rojas P . Workplace accident-related finger-fracture at the Mexican Institute of Social Security. Resolution time, economic impact and sequelae. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2008; 45(6):557-64. View

Chalmer J, Blakeway M, Adams Z, Milan S . Conservative interventions for treating hyperextension injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (2):CD009030. PMC: 11403558. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009030.pub2. View

Tyser A, Tsai M, Parks B, Means Jr K . Stability of acute dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2013; 39(1):13-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.09.025. View

Thomsen N, Petersen M, Hovgaard C . Treatment of hyperextension injuries to the PIP joint. J Hand Surg Br. 1995; 20(3):383-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(05)80098-1. View

Saitta B, Wolf J . Treating Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Dislocations. Hand Clin. 2018; 34(2):139-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2017.12.004. View

Douglass N, Ladd A . Therapy Concepts for the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint. Hand Clin. 2018; 34(2):289-299. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2018.01.001. View

Gianakos A, Yingling J, Athens C, Barra A, Capo J . Treatment for Acute Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fractures and Fracture-Dislocations: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Hand Microsurg. 2020; 12(Suppl 1):S9-S15. PMC: 7735550. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713323. View

10.

Coldham F, Lewis J, Lee H . The reliability of one vs. three grip trials in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. J Hand Ther. 2006; 19(3):318-26. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.04.002. View

11.

Chinchalkar S, Gan B . Management of proximal interphalangeal joint fractures and dislocations. J Hand Ther. 2003; 16(2):117-28. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(03)80007-8. View

12.

Lunger A, Lunger L, Bach A, Frey C, Jandali A, Sproedt J . [Early active motion management of volar plate disruption of the proximal interphalangeal joint after finger hyperextension injury: extension block splinting versus buddy taping]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2017; 49(5):297-303. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-117736. View

13.

Gaine W, Beardsmore J, Fahmy N . Early active mobilisation of volar plate avulsion fractures. Injury. 1999; 29(8):589-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(98)00134-x. View

14.

Kamnerdnakta S, Huetteman H, Chung K . Complications of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Injuries: Prevention and Treatment. Hand Clin. 2018; 34(2):267-288. PMC: 5891829. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2017.12.014. View

15.

Norregaard O, Jakobsen J, Nielsen K . Hyperextension injuries of the PIP finger joint. Comparison of early motion and immobilization. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987; 58(3):239-40. DOI: 10.3109/17453678709146474. View

16.

Caravaggi P, Shamian B, Uko L, Chen L, Melamed E, Capo J . In vitro kinematics of the proximal interphalangeal joint in the finger after progressive disruption of the main supporting structures. Hand (N Y). 2015; 10(3):425-32. PMC: 4551636. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-015-9739-x. View

17.

Thomsen P, Hougaard K, Jorgensen J, BARFRED T . [Hyperextension injuries of the volar fibrocartilage in the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers]. Ugeskr Laeger. 1979; 141(43):2955-7. View

18.

Prosser R . Splinting in the management of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture. J Hand Ther. 1996; 9(4):378-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(96)80045-7. View

19.

MacDermid J, Tottenham V . Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther. 2004; 17(1):18-23. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2003.10.003. View

20.

Stanley E, Seifman M, Mills B, Fay P, Thomas D . Dorsal Block Splinting of Volar Plate Injuries at Neutral Position. Ann Plast Surg. 2019; 82(5):520-522. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001820. View