» Articles » PMID: 36848053

Characterizing Supervision-as-usual: Findings from Two Provider Surveys

Overview
Journal Psychol Serv
Date 2023 Feb 27
PMID 36848053
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although clinical supervision is widely seen as critical for professional training and for safeguarding and promoting client well-being in mental health care, it is understudied, particularly in publicly funded services. In surveys of two large samples of youth mental health service providers (a state sample of providers billing Medicaid [ = 1,057] and a national sample of professional guild members [ = 1,720]), we examined the amount of time providers reported spending in supervision and consultation in a typical workweek and its covariation with characteristics of providers' caseloads and work settings. Across both samples, providers reported spending an average of 2-3 hr per week in supervision. Serving higher percentages of low-income clients was associated with significantly more supervision time. Working in private practice was associated with less supervision, while community mental health and residential facilities were each associated with more supervision time. The national survey also measured providers' perceptions of their current supervision. On average, providers endorsed feeling comfortable with the amount of supervision received and supported by their supervisors. However, working with more low-income clients was associated with greater need for supervisor approval and oversight and with less comfort in the amount of supervision received. Those working with more low-income clientele may benefit from additional supervision time or more focused supervision coverage of the specific needs of clients with low-income. More in-depth research on critical processes and content in supervision is a much-needed future direction for supervision research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

References
1.
Choy-Brown M, Stanhope V . The Availability of Supervision in Routine Mental Health Care. Clin Soc Work J. 2019; 46(4):271-280. PMC: 6426317. DOI: 10.1007/s10615-018-0687-0. View

2.
Cho E, Tugendrajch S, McMillen J, Proctor E, Hawley K . Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices within Treatment-As-Usual and Evidence-Based Practice Initiatives. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022; 49(5):757-784. PMC: 11003240. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-022-01197-z. View

3.
Cho E, Wood P, Taylor E, Hausman E, Andrews J, Hawley K . Evidence-Based Treatment Strategies in Youth Mental Health Services: Results from a National Survey of Providers. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018; 46(1):71-81. PMC: 7357714. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-018-0896-4. View

4.
Ronis S, Slaunwhite A, Malcom K . Comparing Strategies for Providing Child and Youth Mental Health Care Services in Canada, the United States, and The Netherlands. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017; 44(6):955-966. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-017-0808-z. View

5.
Paris Jr M, Hoge M . Burnout in the mental health workforce: a review. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2009; 37(4):519-28. DOI: 10.1007/s11414-009-9202-2. View