» Articles » PMID: 36846933

A Stigma-reduction Intervention Targeting Abortion and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescents in Kisumu County, Kenya: a Quasi-experimental Study

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of a school-based stigma-reduction intervention focusing on stigmatising attitudes towards girls associated with abortion and contraceptive use. In February 2017, two gender-mixed secondary schools ( = 1368) in peri-urban areas of Kisumu County, Kenya, were assigned to receive either an 8-hour stigma-reduction intervention over four sessions (intervention school: IS) or standard comprehensive sexuality education (control school: CS). A classroom survey entailing two five-point Likert scales - the 18-item Adolescents Stigmatizing Attitudes, Beliefs and Actions (ASABA) scale, which measures abortion stigma, and the seven-item Contraceptive Use Stigma (CUS) scale - was conducted to collect data at baseline, 1-month and 12-months after the intervention. The intervention was to be considered effective if a mean score reduction of 25% was achieved for both the ASABA (primary outcome) and the CUS (secondary outcome) at the IS between baseline and 12-month follow-up. 1207 (IS = 574; CS = 633) students were included in analyses at 1-month follow-up, and 693 (IS = 323; CS = 370) at 12-months (the final-year students had left school). A decrease in mean score on both scales was observed at 1-month at both schools. At 12-months, the score decrease was 30.1% at the IS and 9.0% at the CS for ASABA, and 27.3% at the IS and 7.9% at the CS for CUS. At the IS, the score decrease for ASABA between baseline and 12-months was 23.3% among girls and 31.2% among boys; for CUS, the decrease was 27.3% and 24.3%, respectively. ASABA and CUS were positively correlated ( = 0.543;  < 0.001), implying a broader perspective on reproductive stigma. A four-session, school-based stigma-reduction intervention could lead to transformed values and attitudes towards gender norms among adolescents regarding abortion and contraceptive use. Stigma associated with abortion and contraception should become a priority for high-quality CSE programmes.

Citing Articles

Impact of sexual and reproductive health interventions among young people in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.

Chipako I, Singhal S, Hollingsworth B Front Glob Womens Health. 2024; 5:1344135.

PMID: 38699461 PMC: 11063325. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1344135.

References
1.
Hakansson M, Super S, Oguttu M, Makenzius M . Social judgments on abortion and contraceptive use: a mixed methods study among secondary school teachers and student peer-counsellors in western Kenya. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):493. PMC: 7161104. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08578-9. View

2.
Mohamed S, Izugbara C, Moore A, Mutua M, Kimani-Murage E, Ziraba A . The estimated incidence of induced abortion in Kenya: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15:185. PMC: 4546129. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0621-1. View

3.
Munakampe M, Zulu J, Michelo C . Contraception and abortion knowledge, attitudes and practices among adolescents from low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):909. PMC: 6267062. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3722-5. View

4.
Singh S, Maddow-Zimet I . Facility-based treatment for medical complications resulting from unsafe pregnancy termination in the developing world, 2012: a review of evidence from 26 countries. BJOG. 2015; 123(9):1489-98. PMC: 4767687. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13552. View

5.
Brookman-Amissah E, Moyo J . Abortion law reform in sub-Saharan Africa: no turning back. Reprod Health Matters. 2005; 12(24 Suppl):227-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0968-8080(04)24026-5. View