» Articles » PMID: 36846696

Protective Gloves, Hand Grip Strength, and Dexterity Tests: A Comprehensive Study

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 Feb 27
PMID 36846696
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Protective gloves can affect hand performance indicators (HPIs) like manual dexterity and hand grip. The present study was conducted to comprehensively and comparatively investigate several types of protective gloves and HPI assessment tools. Seventeen healthy men participated in this study. Four types of protective gloves, two structural firefighting and two general protective gloves, were investigated using four different dexterity tests and the bulb dynamometer. Structural firefighting gloves were significantly different in terms of dexterity, while there was no significant difference between general protective gloves. In contrast, firefighting gloves were not significantly different in terms of hand grip strength, while general protective gloves were significantly different in this regard. Among the four investigated tests, the hand tool dexterity test had the highest discrimination power. The negative effects of structural firefighting gloves on HPIs were higher than those of general protective gloves. A trade-off between safety requirements and hand performance is needed.

Citing Articles

A New Approach to Implementing 3D-Printed Material Structures for Protective Gloves with the Use of Ultrasonic and Contact Welding Processes: A Preliminary Study.

Irzmanska E, Cichocka A, Puszkarz A, Olejnik O, Kropidlowska P Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(22).

PMID: 39597226 PMC: 11595776. DOI: 10.3390/ma17225404.


Possible differences in the performances of vibration-reducing gloves when used with hammers of different sizes.

Degan G, Antonucci A, Coltrinari G, Lippiello D Heliyon. 2024; 10(22):e39945.

PMID: 39584113 PMC: 11585755. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39945.


The wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique in thumb injuries: a systematic review.

do Rosario Saraiva M, Vazquez O, Ortiz-Huerta J, Santamaria-Vazquez M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024; 50(6):2833-2842.

PMID: 38967789 PMC: 11666634. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02579-8.

References
1.
Kovacs K, Splittstoesser R, Maronitis A, Marras W . Grip force and muscle activity differences due to glove type. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002; 63(3):269-74. DOI: 10.1080/15428110208984713. View

2.
Dianat I, Haslegrave C, Stedmon A . Methodology for evaluating gloves in relation to the effects on hand performance capabilities: a literature review. Ergonomics. 2012; 55(11):1429-51. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2012.708058. View

3.
Sawyer J, Bennett A . Comparing the level of dexterity offered by latex and nitrile SafeSkin gloves. Ann Occup Hyg. 2005; 50(3):289-96. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mei066. View

4.
Millard C, Vaughan N . Assessment of Protective Gloves for Use with Airfed Suits. Ann Occup Hyg. 2015; 59(8):1022-33. PMC: 4593182. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mev039. View

5.
Wang Y, Wickstrom R, Yen S, Kapellusch J, Grogan K . Assessing manual dexterity: Comparing the WorkAbility Rate of Manipulation Test with the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test. J Hand Ther. 2017; 31(3):339-347. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.03.009. View