» Articles » PMID: 36845724

Effective Oxygen Metabolism-based Prognostic Signature for Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Feb 27
PMID 36845724
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Backgroud: Oxygen metabolism is an important factor affecting the development of tumors, but its roles and clinical value in Colorectal cancer are not clear. We developed an oxygen metabolism (OM) based prognostic risk model for colorectal cancer and explored the role of OM genes in cancer.

Methods: Gene expression and clinical data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas, Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium databases were consider as discovery and validation cohort, respectively. The prognostic model based on differently expressed OM genes between tumor and GTEx normal colorectal tissues were constructed in discovery cohort and validated in validation cohort. The Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to test clinical independent. Upstream and downstream regulatory relationships and interaction molecules are used to clarify the roles of prognostic OM genes in colorectal cancer.

Results: A total of 72 common differently expressed OM genes were detected in the discovery and validation set. A five-OM gene prognostic model including , , , and was established and validated. Risk score determined by the model was an independent prognostic according to routine clinical factors. Besides, the role of prognostic OM genes involves transcriptional regulation of MYC and STAT3, and downstream cell stress and inflammatory response pathways.

Conclusions: We developed a five-OM gene prognostic model and study the unique roles of oxygen metabolism in of colorectal cancer.

Citing Articles

Landscape of unconventional γδ T cell subsets in cancer.

Azimnasab-Sorkhabi P, Soltani-Asl M, Soleiman Ekhtiyari M, Kfoury Junior J Mol Biol Rep. 2024; 51(1):238.

PMID: 38289417 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-024-09267-1.


SEL1L3 as a link molecular between renal cell carcinoma and atherosclerosis based on bioinformatics analysis and experimental verification.

Wang H, Ma X, Li S, Ni X Aging (Albany NY). 2023; 15(22):13150-13162.

PMID: 37993256 PMC: 10713414. DOI: 10.18632/aging.205227.

References
1.
Zeng H, Xu Y, Xu S, Jin L, Shen Y, Rajan K . Construction and Analysis of a Colorectal Cancer Prognostic Model Based on N6-Methyladenosine-Related lncRNAs. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:698388. PMC: 8417314. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.698388. View

2.
Pavlova N, Thompson C . The Emerging Hallmarks of Cancer Metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016; 23(1):27-47. PMC: 4715268. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.006. View

3.
Edwards B, Ward E, Kohler B, Eheman C, Zauber A, Anderson R . Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer. 2009; 116(3):544-73. PMC: 3619726. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24760. View

4.
Jauhiainen S, Laakkonen J, Ketola K, Toivanen P, Nieminen T, Ninchoji T . Axon Guidance-Related Factor FLRT3 Regulates VEGF-Signaling and Endothelial Cell Function. Front Physiol. 2019; 10:224. PMC: 6423482. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00224. View

5.
Keum N, Giovannucci E . Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 16(12):713-732. DOI: 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8. View