» Articles » PMID: 36843691

Techniques for Diagnosing Anastomotic Leaks Intraoperatively in Colorectal Surgeries: A Review

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2023 Feb 27
PMID 36843691
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common surgically curable malignancies worldwide, having a good prognosis even with liver metastasis. This improved patient outcome is marred by anastomotic leaks (AL) in operated patients of colorectal cancer despite a microscopically margin-negative resection (R0). Various risk factors have been attributed to causing this. Preoperative non-modifiable factors are age, male sex, cancer cachexia, and neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, and modifiable factors are comorbidities, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, and malnutrition. Intraoperative risk factors include intraoperative surgical duration, blood loss and transfusions, fluid management, oxygen saturation, surgical technique (stapled, handsewn, or compression devices), and approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic). Postoperative factors like anemia, infection, fluid management, and blood transfusions also have an effect. With the advent of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, many modifiable factors can be optimized to reduce the risk. Prevention is better than cure as the morbidity and mortality of AL are very high. There is still a need for an intraoperative technique to detect the viability of anastomotic ends to predict and prevent AL. Prompt diagnosis of an AL is the key. Many surgeons have proposed using methods like air leak tests, intraoperative endoscopy, Doppler ultrasound, and near-infrared fluorescence imaging to decrease the incidence of AL. All these methods can minimize AL, resulting in significant intraoperative alterations to surgical tactics. This narrative review covers the methods of assessing of integrity of anastomosis during the surgery, which can help prevent anastomotic leakage.

Citing Articles

Real-Time Perfusion and Leak Assessment in Bariatric Surgery: Bridging Traditional and Advanced Techniques.

Farah A, Tatakis A, Malshy K, Mahajna A, Sayida S Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71919.

PMID: 39564049 PMC: 11576053. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71919.


Effect of left colonic artery preservation on perfusion at the anastomosis in rectal cancer surgery evaluated with intraoperative ultrasound.

Lan K, Yang H, Shu S, Zhang F, Sun C, Yu X Tech Coloproctol. 2024; 28(1):157.

PMID: 39532723 PMC: 11557712. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03037-8.


Procalcitonin as an Early Marker of Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage in Postoperative Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Villegas-Coronado L, Villegas-Coronado K, Urrea-Quezada A, Villegas-Coronado D Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e70647.

PMID: 39483587 PMC: 11527337. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70647.

References
1.
Kashiwagi H . The lower limit of tissue blood flow for safe colonic anastomosis: an experimental study using laser Doppler velocimetry. Surg Today. 1993; 23(5):430-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00309502. View

2.
Mulita F, Liolis E, Akinosoglou K, Tchabashvili L, Maroulis I, Kaplanis C . Postoperative sepsis after colorectal surgery: a prospective single-center observational study and review of the literature. Prz Gastroenterol. 2022; 17(1):47-51. PMC: 8942007. DOI: 10.5114/pg.2021.106083. View

3.
Hinoi T, Okajima M, Shimomura M, Egi H, Ohdan H, Konishi F . Effect of left colonic artery preservation on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2013; 37(12):2935-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2194-3. View

4.
. The relationship between method of anastomosis and anastomotic failure after right hemicolectomy and ileo-caecal resection: an international snapshot audit. Colorectal Dis. 2017; . DOI: 10.1111/codi.13646. View

5.
Phillips J, Kyriacou P, Jones D, Shelley K, Langford R . Pulse oximetry and photoplethysmographic waveform analysis of the esophagus and bowel. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008; 21(6):779-83. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328317794d. View