» Articles » PMID: 36836584

Outcome Evaluation of Distal Femoral Fractures Following Surgical Management: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2023 Feb 25
PMID 36836584
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Distal femur fractures are challenging in surgical management as the outcome is crucial for restoring the biomechanical stability and longitudinal axis of the leg and function of the knee joint.

Methods: A retrospective review of all distal femoral fractures treated in a level I trauma center over a decade was performed. The radiographs were reviewed for fracture entity, osseous healing, implant failure, mechanical axis, and degenerative joint changes. Clinical outcome was reviewed regarding postoperative complications and postoperative range of motion of the knee joint.

Results: 130 patients who were managed with screw fixation ( = 35), plating systems ( = 92) or intramedullary nailing systems ( = 3) remained for evaluation. Mean follow up was 26 months. Clinical outcome was significantly better for flexion degrees following screw fixation ( = 0.009). Delayed fracture union ( = 0.002) or non-union ( = 0.006) rates were significantly higher in plate osteosynthesis. Mild pathologic deformity for varus and valgus collapse was found following plate osteosynthesis.

Conclusions: Screw fixation shows fewer postoperative complications than plate fixation and is favored for extra and partial intraarticular distal femur fractures. Plating constructs remain the superior fixation method in complex distal femur fractures but are associated with higher rates of non-union and leg axis deviation.

Citing Articles

Intraoperative Fracture during the Insertion of Advanced Locking Screws (T2 Alpha Femur Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing System): Report of Two Cases and Identifying Causes and Prevention.

Higuchi T, Taninaka A, Yoshimizu R, Hayashi K, Miwa S, Yamamoto N J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 38673664 PMC: 11051005. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082393.

References
1.
Kumar M, Singh R, Khiyani R, Kaur K, Svareen . Evaluation of results of open distal femur fractures with primary fixation and antibiotic impregnated collagen. Chin J Traumatol. 2019; 22(6):328-332. PMC: 6921170. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.08.005. View

2.
Gustilo R, Anderson J . Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976; 58(4):453-8. View

3.
Higgins T, Pittman G, Hines J, Bachus K . Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2007; 21(1):43-6. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31802bb372. View

4.
Sen S, Ando T, Kobayashi E, Miyamoto H, Ohashi S, Tanaka S . Development of femoral bone fracture model simulating muscular contraction force by pneumatic rubber actuator. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015; 2014:6872-5. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6945207. View

5.
Schutz M, Muller M, Regazzoni P, Hontzsch D, Krettek C, van der Werken C . Use of the less invasive stabilization system (LISS) in patients with distal femoral (AO33) fractures: a prospective multicenter study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005; 125(2):102-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-004-0779-x. View