» Articles » PMID: 36836439

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2023 Feb 25
PMID 36836439
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student's -test.

Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, = 0.010).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients.

Citing Articles

A Personalized Approach to Adhesion Prevention in Single-Port Access Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Adhesion Barriers and Patient-Specific Risk Factors.

Lim S, Noh J, Seo J, Chung Y, Kim T J Pers Med. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39997345 PMC: 11856206. DOI: 10.3390/jpm15020068.


Learning Curve Analysis of Single-Incision Ovarian Cystectomy: Comparative Study of Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques.

Kim S, Lee S, Seol A, Lee S, Song J, Lee J J Pers Med. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39201977 PMC: 11355174. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14080785.


Effectiveness and safety of SR-ENS-600endoscopic surgical system in benign and malignant gynecological diseases: a prospective, multicenter, clinical trial with 63 cases.

Chang R, Ping D, Yang S, Yongjun W, Wei Z, Ying Z J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):210.

PMID: 38727869 PMC: 11087307. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01871-4.


Soft tissue surgical robot for minimally invasive surgery: a review.

Kim M, Zhang Y, Jin S Biomed Eng Lett. 2023; 13(4):561-569.

PMID: 37872994 PMC: 10590359. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-023-00326-3.


Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence and a Guideline to Determine Treatment Strategy.

Eoh K, Lee Y, Nam E, In Jung H, Kim Y J Pers Med. 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 37373878 PMC: 10303730. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13060890.

References
1.
Bingmer K, Ofshteyn A, Stein S, Marks J, Steinhagen E . Decline of open surgical experience for general surgery residents. Surg Endosc. 2019; 34(2):967-972. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06881-0. View

2.
Nakayama K, Yoshimura Y, Razia S, Yamashita H, Ishibashi T, Ishikawa M . Single-port laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cystectomy: A single-center analysis of 25 cases. Mol Clin Oncol. 2021; 15(2):160. PMC: 8237204. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2322. View

3.
Kim T, Lee Y, Cha H, Kim C, Choi C, Lee J . Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24(9):2248-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0944-y. View

4.
Lee D, Kim S, Kim K, Lee J, Suh C, Kim S . Advantages of Single-Port Laparoscopic Myomectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 25(1):124-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.651. View

5.
Kirshtein B, Haas E . Single port laparoscopic surgery: concept and controversies of new technique. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012; 2012:456541. PMC: 3504420. DOI: 10.1155/2012/456541. View